I haven't played the game so i don't know if the game deserved this score, they do seem pretty specific with their complaints. I just wonder though if IGN is simply butthurt about not getting a review copy and decided they are going to try to throw their weight around.

I have to admit, that's a tad worse than I expected. Was hoping for an 8.

A couple of years ago I might have agreed with you but a 7 from IGN these days isn't so hot.  The question is whether to put any stock in that 7 or not and I choose not to. 

Like they always say, you can't spell ignorant without IGN. The game is far superior to WaW in virtually every way, and I've played and beaten both games. I don't know what the hell Bozon was on when he reviewed this game. The fact that he used a leaked screenshot from an extremely early version of the game tells us enough about how much of the game he's played.

There are reviews that people call biased because they don't coincide with their opinions, but this isn't one of them. THIS review is just pure bullshit.

I can't take this review seriously after reading the subject line.
"Activision brings Modern Warfare to the Wii. Isit worth the two year wait?"

Or, more realistically, you're just pointing that out because the game didn't get the score you wanted.

lol xD

At least for hd owners 7=6=bad.

I actually read the review and it was full of mistakes and was obviously rushed. They used beta screens for a REVIEW! That's just unacceptable. Disregard this review, it is actually a pretty good game.

I've heard nothing but good things word of mouth wise about this game. It might be two years later but atleast Wii owners are still getting it.

I'll have to pick up a copy myself down the road just Wii online multiplayer.