FACT: ALL the sites that scored MWR so far, scored it ABOVE TC (at metacritics) except everyere that gave the same score to both.
FACT: Only IGN dared to score TC above MWR.
FACT:ONLY IGN IS THANKED INGAME WHEN YOU BEAT TC.


draw your own conclussions

Not sure if he worked on the game directly, but that does mean a conflict of interest, thus making the review suspect at the very least.

IGN were the first source with an online review of the game, they've gotten a boatload of hits in the last couple of days, including a few from me reading through the pages of comments unanimously deriding the review as a sham.

If I were cynical I would say that wii.ign decided that people were going to buy this game regardless of their review and decided to milk the hits. If so Bozon is sitting in his office this morning with a smug mission-accomplished-like grin on his face.

Perhaps he has a case of anal-soreness because Activision didn't grace them with a review copy.  I mean come on, they're IGN, what was Activision thinking?? /sarcasm

Oh, a troll. I'm glad I didn't click the review then.

Haha it probably came in today, I got my review copy today but I decided that it'd be most efficient to buy the game, so we could review it ASAP, and do extensive gameplay since I spend a few days with every game I review to make sure I'm discrediting a game before giving it it's due.

Hey guys. I did a quick review of MWii.

http://www.vgchartz.com/games/gamereviewdisp.php?id=39017&reviewid=753

I havent played the singleplayer enough but read on!

"Some large objects have blurry textures while some small objects will have crisp textures."

Most 3D games I play are like that. Since larger objects need a hell of a lot more texturing, that's what needs to be done for it to work.

He must have downloaded some not-so-functional early version of the game or something, otherwise why would he use that old screen?