Yes, but after Free Radical has made an engine for the PS3, and considering the relationship that they have with Sony, it is very unlikely that TS4 will be exclusive for 360. I think that Free Radical have not decided what platforms it will be on, as otherwise they would have announced what platform it's coming for

Why does graphics have to be mentioned for the technical reasons only - such as the screen resolution texture resolutions and polycount? It's all nothing when it comes to art direction, style, class or call it whatever you want.

While the games which want to mimic the real world sure can benefit with the above mentioned technical aspects, the games such as mario and R&C benefit mostly from their art direction.

As one of the good examples of art direction (IMO) and bypassing of technical limitations i would like to mention Neverhood. That game had class :)

I have to say my PS3 is spoiling me a bit....when the first game you get for a new system looks like RFOM, you get some pretty high expectations. Playing FEAR right now, and I was actually struck by how smooth and nice everything was, not to mention the awesome lighting, but also kind of bland compared to RFOM, despite being WAY better looking than any shooter I'd played before RFOM.

Also, I would chalk up some of R&C's graphical prowess to Insomniac's having  developed RFOM....but I don't have any explanation as to why Resistance looks so good.

there is no question that technically R&C has better graphics than SMG, if you think other wise you are just a wii fanboy, art style though is just as important but is subjective so shouldn't be taken into account when comparing which two games have better graphics.