"We get Darth Vader on SC4 free, while you have to pay for him!"

That'll shut them up.

O.o I guess some people are missing the point I'm making. By dick move I meant forcing 360 folks to pay for it whilst ps3 folks got it for free.

http://www.vg247.com/2009/04/23/arkham-asylum-eidos-confirms-joker-as-ps3-exclusive-playable-character/

OP I'd suggest you avoid thread titles that are definite when the content is a rumour.

I'm not interested in the game either way but an inaccurate title is sure to encourage arguing.

Right now Joker has been announced as PS3 exclusive with some rumours it will find its way to 360 too.

For the record, I don't like exclusive content, etc. as I think the core game should be the same on both consoles (although this gen MS has been the main driver of the trend so I do find it a little amusing when the shoe's on the other foot).

LOL

I'm just reporting what the article says. I know how rumors work and I know the site could be wrong but that is up to the users to talk about and decide for themselves until we get an official announcement on the 360 version.

I know how to work the forums, you're not really acting "reasonable" you're just acting like a mod suck up. Thanks anyway, friend.

Anyway...

The same site announed that the content is still PS3 exclusive http://www.vg247.com/2009/04/23/arkham-asylum-eidos-confirms-joker-as-ps3-exclusive-playable-character/ . I don't know what the hell is going on, I guess we will have to wait until closer to launch when they come out more publically about the content.

PS3 has it for free...

If 360 has it it will be delayed and will cost £5.

Ah, I see. It does not fit on the X360 disc :D

You should ask Twest if I'm a mod suck up after my row with him recently on a thread...

I just hate inaccuracies.  Sure the site is claiming it's true - they would wouldn't they?

But given you type in the thread title is it too hard to type - 'source claims Joker not PS3 exclusive after all'?

As for forum use I'd argue the title should make clear the content of the post, not take an attention grabbing bit of the post that may well be inaccurate.

I could have put rumor in there, this is true but simply by clicking in the thread you see right way "Rumor" in bold so I didn't deem it necessary. I can do this if it makes the forum goings easier for you but it really isn't a big deal in this situation because I believe I made it clear it is a rumor and what source said this. I wasn't trying to grab in anybody with misleading titles.

This isn't really the point of the thread anyway, it's to discuss the article and what the users think about it. The thread has gone pretty smoothly and nothing too negative has erupted with the exception of you and I. So I'm going to end this deviation from the original post and say that if we're not going to talk about the content that the topic is about, than don't bother posting anymore in this thread because we are now cooperatively derailing the thread into a pointless disagreement.

Thank you.

-------------

Anyone else want to guess that gameplay will be a star feature in next week's GTTV?