Ok, enlighten me regarding which part is wrong?

Ps3 is dead last...... check.

Ps2 on its last legs....... check.

psp getting owned by ds...... check.

Ps3 fans p*ssed at the fact that ps3 is in 3rd place....... check.

sony got to the top due to moneyhatting 3rd party games....... check.

Sega never have and never will have the kind of money that sony has to throw around..... check.

Congrats to ps1 and ps2 for winning their generations...... check.

sony fan's looking back fondly at the "good old days" whilst playing their nextbox or nextendo..... work in progress.

Righto

Why does the OP care enough about Sony fans to ask this question? This thread is nothing but flamebait. tch.

Well, if SEGA was in the business and Sonic went elsewhere then yeah I can see SEGA fans being upset that a 1st party title went elswhere, but that doesn't happen.

In Sony's case they have many 1st party titles that are of high quality and they aren't going anywhere else. 3rd party games, well, Sony can't control what they do. If they want to go multi then they will just go multi. No point in wasting millions of dollars to get it exclusive if they are still getting it anyways. How many times have we seen games this year that we thought were exclusive to one system end up on another? 

I would rather that money be used to make more 1st party titles, and this time around I am seeing many many many of them right around the corner.

I pity the those who get upset because a game is multiplatform. 

Good example is Tales fans who bought the game on 360. Now they call Namco "Scamco" because they feel they ripped them off with the PS3 version containing so much more, meanwhile they thought it wasn't going there.

Those types of fans are everywhere and not just Sony fans like this thread tried to point out.

Im a Mets fan and a Sony fan and i approve this post 100%

OP: R u serious.... u make threads like these calling ppl out and then ask "well why r u so deffencive....?"

SEGA lost, let it go already.

We aren't in the 90's anymore.

By the way, you look like the aggressive one here, not the Sony fans.

I think you could actually narrow down the assessment to the following: console fanboy + internet = bad ass talking idiot with little basis in facts. This is the same for all the consoles it's just you'd notice more of it on Sony's side on this forum due to the greater number of Sony fans. If we make the assumption that there is a set percentage of console owners who will be fanboys then if one console has a greater number it's very likely they will have more fanboys in their population too. That would be my reasoning behind the Seece noticing it more with the Sony ones than other consoles.

I think fanboys of all consoles have the same attitudes so in my opinion it's wrong to say one group is more aggressive than the other.

Because the Cheerleaders tell them to be.

See, there's your problem... Not check. Unckeck. Hell, even reversecheck. 

PS3 fans p*ssed at the fact that others still say it has no games ... check.

PS3 fans p*ssed at the fact that others still say it's online is inferior ... check.

PS3 fans p*ssed at the fact that others still say that PS3 fans are p*ssed at Sony ... check.

PS3 fans p*ssed at the fact that others say that the PS3 is doomed ... check.

PS3 fans p*ssed at the fact that others say that Sony is doomed ... check.

PS3 fans p*ssed at the fact that others say that the Blu-Ray is not an asset ... check.

PS3 fans p*ssed at the fact that others still say that the PS3's processor is not an asset ... check.

@ Euphoria

Let it go?

Do you think all sony fans will let it go when sony's time is up? (some will, some won't)

Look how aggressive some of them are now and sony is still hanging on in there.

Maybe i can let it go soon......... (pending sony's inevitable defeat)