That's what you get for stealing my ideas, I was the one who told you that the review had been posted in the chat

My post from the other thread:

I haven't played the game yet (it's sitting next to me unopened, lol), but that seems rather low, and much lower than that average.

It reminds me of Ratchet & Clank Future's 7.5 from there. It's one of the highest rated Ratchet & Clanks, and might've broken 90 if not for there (unlikely, but it would've been closer).

I heard it was around 10. Not bad. I beat NMH (comparable Wii game) in about 13 hours.

losing ur last life it's a game over and starting the game all over again... how stupid can they be?

Oh, no! Game is now worse since it only got a B from one guy!

Heavenly Sword was only 5...

I seem to remember that Gamespot (along with some Nintendo fan(boy)s ) slammed Heavenly Sword for being to short. Madworld is even shorter than Heavenly Sword by the sounds of it.

Apart from that it is positive. Still not sure whether to pick it up...

Read the thread, and you'll see that not one person agrees with that review.

yea it is dissapointing that it is short game, anything less than 15 hours seems pathetic too me.  But madworld has multiplayer somewhat correct.  like co-op or versus.  haven't been looking into much so don't know exactly.

and heavenly sword is singleplayer only so it is much worse that it is short.

and again as stated in other topic, wow they docked it for you having to restart the whole level for dying in it, and even sadder is I didn't notice it said LAST LIFE, meaning its not just dying period, it loosing ALL your lives.  For grading the Wii games so bad all the time you wouldn't think they are so casual

Gamespot loves to underrate games that have been rated highly by other sites unless they are paid to advertise said game on their site, in which case, since Jeff Gerstmann is gone, they will rate a game higher than the average review score.