By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Best system for JRPGs: SNES or PSX?

Darc Requiem said:
pearljammer said:
I'd say the SNES slightly edges out the PS1. Both were amazing RPG consoles.

With Final Fantasy Tactics included, I'm not sure I'd prefer one list over the other.

 

FFT was great but to borrowed just about everything for Tactics Ogre. Tactics Ogre was a better game too IMO.

I agree.  Funny thing is i'm pretty sure Matsuno does too.  FFT was once desribed by him as "dumbed down" for a wider audience when it came to the story.

Which FFT was still pretty complicated politics wise.

But then again it doesn't give you as many philosophical questions as TO does and doesn't force you to deal with as serious issues.

The bad guys and what is right and wrong is more black and white.

 

The only complaints i really here about TO are

1. It's too hard.

2.  Vice.

To which I say two things

1. It's too hard.  It is very challenging at times.

If you feel it's too hard train.  Hell you don't even have to do it yourself you can set up two teams set it on auto and go do something else while you level up.

2. Vice his choice being based on the main characters choice sounds off until you realize his motivation is to put himself to where he can't be abused, and he feels that will be impossible if always shadowed by the main character.



Around the Network

Tough choice? Nope, the SNES wins hands down. Also the SNES > PS2 as well.




starcraft: "I and every PS3 fanboy alive are waiting for Versus more than FFXIII.
Me since the games were revealed, the fanboys since E3."

Skeeuk: "playstation 3 is the ultimate in gaming acceleration"

PS1 Thousand arms (ATLUS) and Vanguard Bandits



SNES.


What the hell no Soul Blazer in that list ??????????



If it isn't turnbased it isn't worth playing   (mostly)

And shepherds we shall be,

For Thee, my Lord, for Thee. Power hath descended forth from Thy hand, That our feet may swiftly carry out Thy command. So we shall flow a river forth to Thee And teeming with souls shall it ever be. In Nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritūs Sancti. -----The Boondock Saints

well , i would like a JRPG on any system and the reason i bought a 360 is to play the JRPGs on it , tho i hate Microsoft (Personal reason , im not a fanboy)



Around the Network
Kasz216 said:
Darc Requiem said:
pearljammer said:
I'd say the SNES slightly edges out the PS1. Both were amazing RPG consoles.

With Final Fantasy Tactics included, I'm not sure I'd prefer one list over the other.

 

FFT was great but to borrowed just about everything for Tactics Ogre. Tactics Ogre was a better game too IMO.

I agree.  Funny thing is i'm pretty sure Matsuno does too.  FFT was once desribed by him as "dumbed down" for a wider audience when it came to the story.

Which FFT was still pretty complicated politics wise.

But then again it doesn't give you as many philosophical questions as TO does and doesn't force you to deal with as serious issues.

The bad guys and what is right and wrong is more black and white.

 

The only complaints i really here about TO are

1. It's too hard.

2.  Vice.

To which I say two things

1. It's too hard.  It is very challenging at times.

If you feel it's too hard train.  Hell you don't even have to do it yourself you can set up two teams set it on auto and go do something else while you level up.

2. Vice his choice being based on the main characters choice sounds off until you realize his motivation is to put himself to where he can't be abused, and he feels that will be impossible if always shadowed by the main character.

You've both gotten me wanting to play Tactics Ogre. I haven't played any from the series before, which should I start at? Does it matter? Or is the story sequential?



pearljammer said:
Kasz216 said:

I agree.  Funny thing is i'm pretty sure Matsuno does too.  FFT was once desribed by him as "dumbed down" for a wider audience when it came to the story.

Which FFT was still pretty complicated politics wise.

But then again it doesn't give you as many philosophical questions as TO does and doesn't force you to deal with as serious issues.

The bad guys and what is right and wrong is more black and white.

 

The only complaints i really here about TO are

1. It's too hard.

2.  Vice.

To which I say two things

1. It's too hard.  It is very challenging at times.

If you feel it's too hard train.  Hell you don't even have to do it yourself you can set up two teams set it on auto and go do something else while you level up.

2. Vice his choice being based on the main characters choice sounds off until you realize his motivation is to put himself to where he can't be abused, and he feels that will be impossible if always shadowed by the main character.

You've both gotten me wanting to play Tactics Ogre. I haven't played any from the series before, which should I start at? Does it matter? Or is the story sequential?

Playing Tactics Ogre is going to be almost impossible. Used copies go for about eighty dollars, minimum, with new ones going for about 400 as a floor. It was released in very limited quantities in the Playstation release in the US. The SNES version never saw a stateside release, to the best of my knowledge.

Hell, I've never played it.



Well, PS1 do have lots of RPGs but some of my most beloved games of all time (Terranigma, Chrono Trigger, Final Fantasy VI and Tales of Phantasia) are all SNES games.
So for me SNES is the nr 1 RPG console, nr 2 being PS1.



SNES for these alone: Earthbound, Mario RPG, Chrono Trigger
all with no load times...



"After you win, son, I feel like going for a ride on your bike, haha." ~Doc Louis (Punch Out Wii)

 

 

i have pretty much all those games for both systems and i enjoyed playing them on both systems but i must say i do find my self going back and playing the snes games once in a while so i guess i have to say the snes for me(although the ps1 games are great too)