The Legend of Zelda, Mario, 100s of new IPs, Kirby, Kid Icaus, Fire Emblem, Starfox, F-zero, DOnkey Kong, Metriod Prime, Pikmin, 3rd party IPs, Red Steel 2, No More Heroes, and much much more.

If the Wii has nearly 50% market share, and has 3 true exclusives compared to 3 for 360 and 2 for PS3, you don't find that odd?

Edit: Oh, and PS3 has 3 now because Killzone 2 is at 95% with 18 reviews.

Edit 2:  If you just look at 90% games or above, regardless of exclusivity, 360 has 18, PS3 has 10, and Wii has 8.  it's just that half of the Wii's is playable on the last generation hardware.  I can play 2 of them on my PS3 because it has backwards compatibility.  I finished RE4 recently on my PS3.  Whichever way you look at it, it's very odd.

Nothing currently announced has much of a chance at AAA

What makes you think sequels to Fire Emblem and No More Heroes will be rated over 90% and/or sell a lot when the originals didn't?

is Donkey Kong confirmed?  that would be interesting.  Red Steel 1 was terrible.  Where are these 100s of new IPs coming from?

@ the Underlined - what's up with the name calling?  Seriously you throw around names and even call people ignorant, mind you name calling is against the rules.

And yes the context sensitive cut scenes were more satisfying because you got an ergonomic controller with a rather large button to press when you have to sprint then the doding done with the analog shoulder buttons something that was adopted all around this generation. 

As far as Okami goes, again why don't you play it so you can actually judge for yourself, for me personally I haven't had an issue, and the vibrant colors, solid framerate, widescreen, and quicker and easier brush strokes make Okami on Wii a much better game.

And it's very easy to just turn your argument around, the Wii has the highest rated exclusive game this generation, period.  See how easy that is to turn around?  Why hasn't the 360 in the extra year it's been out not have a title to top this?  Or PS3 with it's extra power, blu-ray support, and sixaxis motion controller been able to top it?  Really man just enjoy the games instead of trying to put down a system you don't like it's just silly.

I ignore your points for the simple fact that you've obviously never played the games you try to tear down, much like in the other debates, you tried to say Metroid Prime 3 doesn't look any better then Metroid Prime 2 & 1 when any half blind old lady with her glasses still being repaired at lens crafters could tell the improvements if they actually PLAYED the game instead of looking at some grainy low res you tube video most likely captured with a camera or a cell phone.  

Onimusha isn't that great of a reference just so you know. 

But it boils down to is that you blast the Wii day in and out yet you've obviously never played the very games you talk bad about, either that or you're a troll, which is worse, I don't know which is worse for you personally to either lack the knowledge of the topic you're trying to debate or just troll cause you don't like the Wii.

Well, I assume he means squirrel, but it's misspelled and I had to look it up to know I was spelling it correctly. if not, I have no idea what it means. If calling him Happy Rat is offensive I'm sure you can get me banned for it. Btw, no credit for calling you Maxwell Smart? *sigh*

As for calling someone "ignorant," please look up the definition because that's not name calling.

You are seriously nitpicking with the cutscenes, dude. it's just a preference of controller. I much prefer symmetric controls, myself, but I wouldn't ever say a quicktime cutscene (which I hate anyway) makes 1 version of a game better.

I have played both versions of Okami, all versions of Mario, and MP3. However, I can also read the reviews I posted and assume they aren't making things up. I played RE4 on my PS3 and it was fine visually. gametrailer/youtube/etc comparisons are usually fairly accurate, but if you disagree, fine. You can continue to believe that the games were far superior on Wii, but most reviews don't seem to denote a big difference. RE4 on PS2 is better than RE4 on GC because it has 6 hours of extra content. If you don't care about that, either, then fine, disagree.

from my post above:

If the Wii has nearly 50% market share, and has 3 true exclusives compared to 3 for 360 and 2 for PS3, you don't find that odd?  Oh, and PS3 has 3 now because Killzone 2 is at 95% with 18 reviews. If you just look at 90% games or above, regardless of exclusivity, 360 has 18, PS3 has 10, and Wii has 8. it's just that half of the Wii's is playable on the last generation hardware. I can play 2 of them on my PS3 because it has backwards compatibility. I finished RE4 recently on my PS3. Whichever way you look at it, it's very odd.

You used the word attack, I believe, but I'm not doing that. I am saying I don't expect many AAA games because so far there haven't been a lot. I said I found it odd that the dominating system doesn't have more, but there are many reasons for that that aren't going to change.

You guys need to get outside.

funny, i sometimes wonder if those people really played the same games i did. when i played ada, everything was a de-ja-vu of leon, why the hell would i even care why they ran at the sound of the bell? zomg now i know! this feature is awesome man, it totally beats the atomsphere of the gamecube version! and during the year of 2005, everybody had a HD TV! that makes so much sense as to why the PS2 version is so much more superior even though it looked worse on every account side by side! it's my turn to ask you, have you played the games? The paper filter was a CHEAT that clover came up with to compensate for the PS2's hardware limitations, it's not the other way around despite what people believe, and it was extremely clever work and very good low lvl programming, but nowhere as beautiful as the Wii version was overall because of the blurring of it. good for you that you like the feel of the filter though. oh on a side note, if they actually bothered to release a second version of RE4 on the cube with 480p and wide screen that you'd very much care about, it'd have looked better than the interlaced version which was already way above the ps2 version, think about that, oh wait a second, yeah..... at least we agree on that part.

Ok, you didn't care about 6 hours of content that revealed what Ada was doing the whole time, and you can't accept that the graphical difference in the games isn't a big factor in the enjoyment of it (which is ironic considering you are defending the Wii against HD systems as well).

I don't care what the reason was for the aesthetics in Okami, the paper feel was more suited to the game, imo.

I wish you'd come to terms with people not agreeing with you. You point to that video showing major graphical differences but I don't see it that way. I see it the same as SMG to SMS comparisons and MP3 to MP2 comparisons. If you think the differences are so major and have such an effect on gameplay, I hope you have an HD system.

Regardless of which game was better looking to you, you can't deny the facts I've posted about the Wii's list of 90+ games being rather low for a system that has 50% market share. I'm not sure why you continue to ignore my main point.

I don't really wanna be part of this argument, but I have to step in here. There is no way the Ada content was 6 hours.