Well, I assume he means squirrel, but it's misspelled and I had to look it up to know I was spelling it correctly. if not, I have no idea what it means. If calling him Happy Rat is offensive I'm sure you can get me banned for it. Btw, no credit for calling you Maxwell Smart? *sigh*
As for calling someone "ignorant," please look up the definition because that's not name calling.
You are seriously nitpicking with the cutscenes, dude. it's just a preference of controller. I much prefer symmetric controls, myself, but I wouldn't ever say a quicktime cutscene (which I hate anyway) makes 1 version of a game better.
I have played both versions of Okami, all versions of Mario, and MP3. However, I can also read the reviews I posted and assume they aren't making things up. I played RE4 on my PS3 and it was fine visually. gametrailer/youtube/etc comparisons are usually fairly accurate, but if you disagree, fine. You can continue to believe that the games were far superior on Wii, but most reviews don't seem to denote a big difference. RE4 on PS2 is better than RE4 on GC because it has 6 hours of extra content. If you don't care about that, either, then fine, disagree.
from my post above:
If the Wii has nearly 50% market share, and has 3 true exclusives compared to 3 for 360 and 2 for PS3, you don't find that odd? Oh, and PS3 has 3 now because Killzone 2 is at 95% with 18 reviews. If you just look at 90% games or above, regardless of exclusivity, 360 has 18, PS3 has 10, and Wii has 8. it's just that half of the Wii's is playable on the last generation hardware. I can play 2 of them on my PS3 because it has backwards compatibility. I finished RE4 recently on my PS3. Whichever way you look at it, it's very odd.
You used the word attack, I believe, but I'm not doing that. I am saying I don't expect many AAA games because so far there haven't been a lot. I said I found it odd that the dominating system doesn't have more, but there are many reasons for that that aren't going to change.
