@noname2200
You voted for Nintendo to abandon hardcore gamers so they could make some more money. Hilarious really.
@noname2200
You voted for Nintendo to abandon hardcore gamers so they could make some more money. Hilarious really.
noname2200 said:
Congratulations, my good man: in only two lines, you've managed to be more wrong than an unsupervised Michael Jackson at an orphanage. Galaxy, Brawl, Kart, Metroid, Fire Emblem, and so many more, all released in the past year...Yeah, they're walking away from their loyal fans alright (a category which I can only assume does not include you, as you seem to be paying them zero attention!). And who, precisely, defines what a "serious game" is? (Hint: not you.) This is the same company that came out with the decidely non-traditional Mario Paint in the early 90's, the company which released a game designed to teach you keyboarding on the SNES. Hell, this is a company that made a fat Italian plumber eat mushrooms and fight a fire-breathing dragon, or go up against a giant monkey, the company which slapped an elf in a mini-skirt and had him fight a giant pig, a company which made an entire game based on one man's gardening hobby. Serious games? Perish the thought, lad; it'd make Nintendo into a company as boring as Ubisoft. Oh, and welcome to the forums. @Shameless: If that's the definition of a game, then I suppose I'm none too interested in playing them. How fortunate for me that it's not, eh? |
Sorry mate, by "make serious" I meant support serious games... and my "abandoning loyal fans" is sourced in their conference - nothing serious at all... I've started paying attention to all this console war stuff/releases/etc. only recently, so I made my statement on recent news. thanks.
Xen said:
Sorry mate, by "make serious" I meant support serious games... and my "abandoning loyal fans" is sourced in their conference - nothing serious at all... I've started paying attention to all this console war stuff/releases/etc. only recently, so I made my statement on recent news. thanks.
|
And I in turn apologize for my tone. Although I maintain the "welcome to the forum" part.
RolStoppable said:
The general consensus is that the 360 and PS3 are systems for hardcore gamers. Microsoft's H&E division: approximately $2.5 billion in losses since launch of the 360. Does it make sense to cater to hardcore gamers? |
I don't care if they lose money, it's not mine. I want hardcore games.
| Shameless said: @noname2200 You voted for Nintendo to abandon hardcore gamers so they could make some more money. Hilarious really. |
Considering how I don't care for the snobcore at all, I'd gladly vote to abandon them even if it meant Pauly Shores would make a comeback. I neither know nor care why you drape yourself in that mantle, but in the future kindly do not imply I would ever stoop to care for the snobcore, let alone desire to associate with them. Thank you in advance.
RolStoppable said:
I understand that. But how long do you think will companies continue to make hardcore games first and foremost if that is what they get? |
microsoft is a big company they can take te hit,also they have been showing profit in te last quaters
RolStoppable said:
I understand that. But how long do you think will companies continue to make hardcore games first and foremost if that is what they get? |
Bu-bu-but it pleases the (shrinking) fanbase! Companies exist solely to make me personally happy, and when one shuts down another will simply take its place!
brute said:
microsoft is a big company they can take te hit,also they have been showing profit in te last quaters |
Sony can take that hit as well, the PSP is selling very well, and the PS2 is cheap to produce and still very very very popular (I have an NTSC PS2 and a PAL one :P )
RolStoppable said:
So you say that it is okay for a company to lose tons of money as long as they satisfy a group of gamers? |
but like i said micrsoft made some profit in their last quaters