1 - There are gamers and non-gamers. What part of this dichotomy you don't understand? You are not the one who will change those definitions.

2 - So, there is somethong wrong, there thousands of gamers who bought and still will bought Wii Fit. 

 3- You already said you're a fanboy, so you have a more biased view than most people would do. What is obvious in your mind most probably won't fit in others pleople's minds.

By the way, why would DDR be about getting higher scores? If it was about that people just prefer to play tetris. DDR is about having fun while dancing/exercising. People like DDR very likely to be attracted to Wii Fit since they have close concepts.  

And for those who doesn't want Wii Fit. Don't buy it. You are bitching about what? You have to bought just because millions are buing it? Buy what you like and let the others do the same.

Do you know what defines "rights" and "duties"?

You would be defending the right you stated when you don't buy Wii Fit because you don't like it. 

 okay, i've said something similar i think half a year ago...  you have very strong opinion of things and you stick to your guns, and i respect that.  but you arguments need some work.  for instance, like in this thread, you start defining things the way you see it, and say others are wrong because the definitions don't match.  well of course there can be no agreement then.  some definitions, like "gamer" and "non-gamer", are either bereft of actual meaning, or so ingrained in people's mind there's no convincing.  thus, you shouldn't bother coming up with a definition for those terms, and if you base your arguments on those definitions there is no way your opinion can get through.

 and if you're debating these definitions... then you're distracted from what you try to prove originally.

 anyway, just my two cents.

(the process of defining things is kind of agitating... because coming up with definitions really get to the bottom of somebody's believes)

that's cool, but why was she playing Wiifit on a 47 inch hdtv? She was standing like 3 feet away from it too... you need to sit atleast 6- 7 feet away from a tv that size to see the visual quality of th... eh heh heh

Anyway good stuff, congratz to ioi I guess >.> oh well good bye hardcore gaming... so funny how Nintendo is using microsofts own language to sell their product for the opposite market the terms were designed to sell products for.

Article on Digg: http://digg.com/gaming_news/Rueters_uses_VGChartz

I think Wii Fit will be the best seller game 2008 after all.

Finally an objective opinion in this thread...

@ssj: The reason for change in definition (which have no basis) is, that these "non-games" are beating most of the traditional games in sales. Just look at it, Brain Training is one of the biggest franchises (sold) this gen. And there's no doubt Wii Fit will be there too. People try to count even Nintendogs out as a game, just because of it's sales since it doesn't fit the former core audience tastes.
I can't see the difference between DDR and Wii Fit by the definition you gave about what DDR is. If Wii Fit is exercise, DDR is dancing. Both focus on non gaming related features. Sure you can get high score in DDR, but that's the same in Wii Fit. Now you would say that Wii Fit is an educative game, but guess what, kids are using DDR to learn discodancing. Whether you want to see Wii Fit as a game or not, it's only about how are you using it, to play minigames or to have exercise, but i'd like to mention that Wii Fit is extremely immersive experience.

Ok, so you critisize Nintendo for calling tech demos as games, is a bit hypocratic, since i noticed that your "games i play" had Unreal Tournament/2004/3, so apparently it takes a dog to know one.

As for the BD, so, if i get a BD player, i can play 60 players online with it, or what were you meaning?
Now the same thing applies to cinematic games as they do to Wii Fit; they focus on non-gaming. MGS4 has 9 hours of video in it (30% of the whole game). So, WTF, i'm a gamer, i don't care about the fucking videos, i'd take 30 hours of gameplay any day over 21 hours of gameplay and 9 hours of video. If i wan't to watch video, i buy a DVD. Atleas Wii Fit focuses on the interactive gameplay.

About what? This thread is about VGChartz getting a mention, not SSJ12 and dtewi's insulting flame wars.

Objective opinion? Well, Pachter says Wii Fit could sell 50 million units if it ends up on Oprah. We all know how much of a Nintendo fanboy he is.

In the end, this is a sales site, and sales determine the console war. Everything else is unquantifiable opinion, and in the history books, on Wikipedia, in 50 years, which consoles are gonna be the footnotes?