@ssj: The reason for change in definition (which have no basis) is, that these "non-games" are beating most of the traditional games in sales. Just look at it, Brain Training is one of the biggest franchises (sold) this gen. And there's no doubt Wii Fit will be there too. People try to count even Nintendogs out as a game, just because of it's sales since it doesn't fit the former core audience tastes.
I can't see the difference between DDR and Wii Fit by the definition you gave about what DDR is. If Wii Fit is exercise, DDR is dancing. Both focus on non gaming related features. Sure you can get high score in DDR, but that's the same in Wii Fit. Now you would say that Wii Fit is an educative game, but guess what, kids are using DDR to learn discodancing. Whether you want to see Wii Fit as a game or not, it's only about how are you using it, to play minigames or to have exercise, but i'd like to mention that Wii Fit is extremely immersive experience.
Ok, so you critisize Nintendo for calling tech demos as games, is a bit hypocratic, since i noticed that your "games i play" had Unreal Tournament/2004/3, so apparently it takes a dog to know one.
As for the BD, so, if i get a BD player, i can play 60 players online with it, or what were you meaning?
Now the same thing applies to cinematic games as they do to Wii Fit; they focus on non-gaming. MGS4 has 9 hours of video in it (30% of the whole game). So, WTF, i'm a gamer, i don't care about the fucking videos, i'd take 30 hours of gameplay any day over 21 hours of gameplay and 9 hours of video. If i wan't to watch video, i buy a DVD. Atleas Wii Fit focuses on the interactive gameplay.
Ei Kiinasti.
Eikä Japanisti.
Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.
Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.
