By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - New Killzone 2 Trailer

Skeeuk on 08 May 2008
MrMarc said:
Looks shit.

I'm not even joking there, how can people still be as over excited as they are for this underwhelming hype fest?

can you care to post a gameplay video from your fave console, that looks as good as the second killzone footage?

.

.

.

im afraid to break the news to you, but you cant post a gameplay video from your fave console, that looks as good as killzone

that second trailer is awsome



...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...

PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk

really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...

Around the Network
Slimebeast on 08 May 2008

Hi Dallinor the cat.

To me there isnt such a big difference between FPS and TPS. And that's why u often see ppl call GoW a FPS.

Maybe GoW took influence from Killzone, but now Killzone 2 is taking influence from GoW. The system where you are using cover, plus you have a little squad.



makingmusic476 on 08 May 2008
Mummelmann said:
Slimebeast said:
Gears of War clone confirmed.

Excuse me? KZ looks and feels a lot like Killzone, which in case you don't know, came out years before Gear of War. If anything, Gears lent a little atmosphere from KZ.

And why are people so impressed by Crysis? It was really, really underwhelming and by far the biggest letdown of last year for me. CoD 4 is an amazing game, but its visuals are fairly standard for an FPS and it is hardly realistic. Brother in Arms is way more realistic. 


Tbh, Killzone was the game that really made the "dark and gritty" artstyle popular.  You can blame it for all the grey/brown shooters these days, lol.



makingmusic476 on 08 May 2008
Slimebeast said:
Hi Dallinor the cat.

To me there isnt such a big difference between FPS and TPS. And that's why u often see ppl call GoW a FPS.

Maybe GoW took influence from Killzone, but now Killzone 2 is taking influence from GoW. The system where you are using cover, plus you have a little squad.

You had a squad in Killzone as well. :|



Mummelmann on 08 May 2008
Slimebeast said:
Hi Dallinor the cat.

To me there isnt such a big difference between FPS and TPS. And that's why u often see ppl call GoW a FPS.

Maybe GoW took influence from Killzone, but now Killzone 2 is taking influence from GoW. The system where you are using cover, plus you have a little squad.

 Freedom Fighters and Brothers in Arms feature both and do them very well at that.



Around the Network
Dallinor on 08 May 2008
Mummelmann said:
Slimebeast said:
Hi Dallinor the cat.

To me there isnt such a big difference between FPS and TPS. And that's why u often see ppl call GoW a FPS.

Maybe GoW took influence from Killzone, but now Killzone 2 is taking influence from GoW. The system where you are using cover, plus you have a little squad.

 Freedom Fighters and Brothers in Arms feature both and do them very well at that.


Ahhh freedom fighters. I loved that game!

The multiplayer was a bit unbalanced though.



 

Blaiyan on 08 May 2008
makingmusic476 said:
Slimebeast said:
Hi Dallinor the cat.

To me there isnt such a big difference between FPS and TPS. And that's why u often see ppl call GoW a FPS.

Maybe GoW took influence from Killzone, but now Killzone 2 is taking influence from GoW. The system where you are using cover, plus you have a little squad.

You had a squad in Killzone as well. :|


Beat me to it.




|_emmiwinks on 12 May 2008
MrMarc said:
What I love most is that people have jumped quickly to make assumptions about me, by linking to a Nintendo board and making assumptions I'm a GeoW fanboy. I've not alot of love for that title either!

Seriously though, what is there to excite with regards to Killzone 2? Boring gunplay? Uninspiring level design? A supposedly beautiful game that the PS3 is going to chug along at 30fps/720p? You all kiss this game's ass for being technically amazing yet really it doesn't look that special at all!

I'm not gonna rave about this game just because it may possibly have the biggest development budget ever, if it ends up being shit in the end, you guys will be the suckers! If not, fair enough, but from what I understand and the general concensus around here - Resistance is the PS3 FPS to keep the eyes on.

 Ok, how do you know that there is boring gun play? Or Uninspired level design? Show me your Youtube video of you playing this game, and showing me those things, not some other Xbot troll on another site, you playing the game. Because both of those statements require you to have PLAYED the game to make.

 

As for the 30fps at 720? The game is running in engine in real time in the game play footage shown and on the floor at the Media day with zero frame stuttering and no slow down, so again, show me the video of it happening. Show me you playing this game and proving it doesn't run at 60fps.

 

Oh, and show me the technical read out from Guerrilla saying that its running in 720. I'll be waiting.

 

You were attacked because you came into this thread as a troll, as such I will be treating you as a troll. 

 

Slime, if a game does something (Killzone), and then another game copies it (Gears of War), and then the sequel to the original game (Killzone 2) that started that does it again with modifications... THEN KILLZONE 2 IS DOING WHAT IT STARTED IN KILLZONE, not copying Gears.



I own all three current consoles and a great gaming rig, now thats out of the way.

This space Reserved for the Nuggets of Wisdom dropped by Bladeforce:

"Why post something like this when all it will get is PS3 owners blinded to reality replying? BOTH THE PS3 AND BLUE-RAY WILL NOT LAST 3 YEARS! TECHNOLOGY CHANGED TOO FAST!"

"is it Wii FIt that has sold as many as PS3's sold? Thats a LOL Look at the total sales of software is it just me that sees Nintendo titles hitting 10m+ and you say they arent making a difference? Another LOL!"

"Hell, with all the negative hype Sony spin, people just aren't interested cost is too high and to get the true HD experience (1080p, 7.1 surround) you will need a $1000+ system. THAT IS GOING TO DO IT IN A RECESSION! PS4 will not happen"

IllegalPaladin on 12 May 2008
|_emmiwinks said:
MrMarc said:
What I love most is that people have jumped quickly to make assumptions about me, by linking to a Nintendo board and making assumptions I'm a GeoW fanboy. I've not alot of love for that title either!

Seriously though, what is there to excite with regards to Killzone 2? Boring gunplay? Uninspiring level design? A supposedly beautiful game that the PS3 is going to chug along at 30fps/720p? You all kiss this game's ass for being technically amazing yet really it doesn't look that special at all!

I'm not gonna rave about this game just because it may possibly have the biggest development budget ever, if it ends up being shit in the end, you guys will be the suckers! If not, fair enough, but from what I understand and the general concensus around here - Resistance is the PS3 FPS to keep the eyes on.

Ok, how do you know that there is boring gun play? Or Uninspired level design? Show me your Youtube video of you playing this game, and showing me those things, not some other Xbot troll on another site, you playing the game. Because both of those statements require you to have PLAYED the game to make.

 

As for the 30fps at 720? The game is running in engine in real time in the game play footage shown and on the floor at the Media day with zero frame stuttering and no slow down, so again, show me the video of it happening. Show me you playing this game and proving it doesn't run at 60fps.

 

Oh, and show me the technical read out from Guerrilla saying that its running in 720. I'll be waiting.

 

You were attacked because you came into this thread as a troll, as such I will be treating you as a troll.

 

Slime, if a game does something (Killzone), and then another game copies it (Gears of War), and then the sequel to the original game (Killzone 2) that started that does it again with modifications... THEN KILLZONE 2 IS DOING WHAT IT STARTED IN KILLZONE, not copying Gears.


To both of you,  

The developers themselves confirmed that the game would run 720p and 30fps. However, just because it's 30fps doesn't mean that the game will be chugging around because Gears of War and Resistance: Fall of Man both ran at 30fps and they by no means 'chugged'. The issue here will be how well the frame rate will stay at 30fps and judging by the gameplay in all previous showings, things have been looking very smooth. Lastly, just because it's 720p doesn't mean it would look any less beautiful. Obviously beauty is one's own opinion, but it shouldn't be tied directly into the resolution the game will run at.



|_emmiwinks on 12 May 2008

HA! I pwned myself on that one. Last I read it was running 60fps and they hadnt commented on the resolution settings.

But dont tell him that, I want him to find the link and show me. :) 



I own all three current consoles and a great gaming rig, now thats out of the way.

This space Reserved for the Nuggets of Wisdom dropped by Bladeforce:

"Why post something like this when all it will get is PS3 owners blinded to reality replying? BOTH THE PS3 AND BLUE-RAY WILL NOT LAST 3 YEARS! TECHNOLOGY CHANGED TOO FAST!"

"is it Wii FIt that has sold as many as PS3's sold? Thats a LOL Look at the total sales of software is it just me that sees Nintendo titles hitting 10m+ and you say they arent making a difference? Another LOL!"

"Hell, with all the negative hype Sony spin, people just aren't interested cost is too high and to get the true HD experience (1080p, 7.1 surround) you will need a $1000+ system. THAT IS GOING TO DO IT IN A RECESSION! PS4 will not happen"