People seem to forget about consoles that came before and what they achieved. Even if they have to scale back for gta6 on switch 2, imagine having a portable device that can play something greatly superior to that of rdr2? When people think of switch 2 and small device, they think weak and underpowered. We haven't even seen proper footage of gta6. It's most likely going to be a long over due delayed ps4 pro title, and thats still an amazing thing.

Absolutely true.  I played RE4 Remake on the PC at 120 fps, finished with 86% accuracy.  Turned around and played the ps5 version at 60 fps and finished at 72% accuracy.

I played Halo Infinite with the wife, she was on my old laptop at 30 fps while I was 120 fps.  She, within 20 minutes, flatly asked me wtf.  She said I was getting headshots before she could land a hit.

I still hate how fps is viewed as graphical when it is gameplay.  Competitive games are high fps for a reason.  

And to be clear, people can buy and enjoy whatever they want.  I just dont want to hear there isnt a difference.  

"Looks like shit" "30fps can go f#ck itself" "its not worth it" doesn't look like fun to me. All this thread have you all trying to throw under the mud the visual performance that doesn't fill all the checks on your criteria. So... yes, it really doesnt matter for me. If Nintendo update their games performance... Good! I will enjoy the updates, but I was just fine how it was before. For you that care for input precision and stuff, Excellent! Not all gamers follow by the same rules and that is what you don't seen to understand.

I have a PC, but it has been years that I don't use it for gaming, bc it is more confortable to play in every corner of my house, like laying down on my couch or on my bed. That kind of freedom and confort I wont give away for something that I dont care! It is really that simple

I can rephrase, if that helps.  I loathe 30 fps, but that is a personal opinion.  Others do not need to share my opinion.

After 3 years of 60 to 120 fps, I just cant play 30 fps.  

But others are free to enjoy what they want.  I prefer my Subaru over a Corvette, but I wouldn't dream of claiming they are the same car.  

This entire debacle started when people claimed there wasn't a difference, that is false.  There is a massive difference, how much people care is an entirely different topic.

Good, now you can go back to thread and take a post where somebody said 30fps and 60fps are the same, bc I cant see it

I think the word "insignificant" have not the meaning as "equivalent"

Your quote:

"We just reached a point thats insignificant "

The difference between 30, 60 and 120 fps isn't insignificant.  if you want to concede that point, I am happy to drop the topic.  

Insignificant =/= Equivalent

there you have it

Insignificant is just flatly the wrong verbiage.  It is significant, you just dont care.

The difference in horsepower between my subaru and a Vette isn't insignificant, it is significant.  I just dont care because I need ground clearance and AWD.

It ain't hard my friend.  Your verbiage was wrong, full stop.

I always thought insignificant goes along with something that you don't care,  something too small to be considered noteworthy. But, fair enough... I will pay attention from now on

To be fair to you, verbiage can be interpreted many ways.  Which makes discussions online hard.  Either way, no worries, I never meant harm or to be a pecker.  

Mobile is a huge selling point.  My daughter prefers S2 over ps5 since I take the TV often.  

And if we are fair, Mobile has come a long way.  Crazy to me a ps4 pro like hardware fits in a pocket.  Hell my gpu, by itself, is bigger than the S2.

Meaning i get people not caring about top graphics.  I am the outlier, not the norm.  Most dont care.