JackHandy said:
I use to make the same claims and have the same opinions about frame rates... until my kid wanted me to download Fall Guys for my Switch 1 so we could play together. I was new to the game, which didn't help, but you would have thought I was a new gamer period. I sucked so bad at it. Like, eye-brow-raisingly bad. I had no idea why until I decided to download it and play it on my PS5. The difference was night and day, and I'm not talking about visuals. The doubling of the frame rate literally doubled my skills, if not tripled them. Just from the frame rates being added. So I am now a believer. I will still play retro games with low frame rates, but modern ones? I look for the versions with the highest rates. Anything else is just handicapping me. |
Absolutely true. I played RE4 Remake on the PC at 120 fps, finished with 86% accuracy. Turned around and played the ps5 version at 60 fps and finished at 72% accuracy.
I played Halo Infinite with the wife, she was on my old laptop at 30 fps while I was 120 fps. She, within 20 minutes, flatly asked me wtf. She said I was getting headshots before she could land a hit.
I still hate how fps is viewed as graphical when it is gameplay. Competitive games are high fps for a reason.
And to be clear, people can buy and enjoy whatever they want. I just dont want to hear there isnt a difference.







