Just another reason not to buy Intel currently.
Good thing that AMD is better in the CPU space currently.
--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--



Just another reason not to buy Intel currently.
Good thing that AMD is better in the CPU space currently.
--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--

So Intel is going to be yet another zombie corp propped up by the US government.
| Tober said: Chips for rockets |
More likely chips for spying to sniff out and persecute any groups Trump doesn't like, which means anybody who's not a rich white male Christian.

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/business/2025/08/26/markets/trump-intel-business-community/
More such moves a possibility, as Trump says ""I hope I'm going to have many more cases like it."
| curl-6 said: https://www.japantimes.co.jp/business/2025/08/26/markets/trump-intel-business-community/ More such moves a possibility, as Trump says ""I hope I'm going to have many more cases like it." |
Wonderful. First the American economy, now he's ruining the tech industry. If Fred Trump had used protection this decade wouldn't have been so shitty. -_-

| Hiku said: I didn't even realize this was a thing. |
Of course it unethical, why Intel get saved and not other many defunct corps?
I know why but won't bother explaining
| SanAndreasX said: So Intel is going to be yet another zombie corp propped up by the US government. |
SanAndreasX said:
That was likely a part of the deal. |

PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.
I am actually not opposed to this, although I wish it was done by some actual law rather than Trump's arbitrary whim.
The tech industry needs to be more democratically embedded than it is. And I say this as a tech worker who is optimistic of the current industry trends.
As a socialist, if Republicans want to accidentally expand public ownership and justify it as some sort of "patriotism" they can go ahead. Next time we get an actual left-wing government (maybe in the 2030's as unemployment reaches 20% due to AI and automation) we can tie this public ownership to social benefits, expand it, and promote cooperativism or codetermination.
| sc94597 said: I am actually not opposed to this, although I wish it was done by some actual law rather than Trump's arbitrary whim. The tech industry needs to be more democratically embedded than it is. And I say this as a tech worker who is optimistic of the current industry trends. As a socialist, if Republicans want to accidentally expand public ownership and justify it as some sort of "patriotism" they can go ahead. Next time we get an actual left-wing government (maybe in the 2030's as unemployment reaches 20% due to AI and automation) we can tie this public ownership to social benefits, expand it, and promote cooperativism or codetermination. |
If the US Government is taking stake in corporations, they need to ensure those corporations are working for the public good, else it is just glorified welfare for big business.
sundin13 said:
If the US Government is taking stake in corporations, they need to ensure those corporations are working for the public good, else it is just glorified welfare for big business. |
Even if the corporations aren't "working for the public good" and just profiting like other corporations, at least the public is ostensibly benefiting by sharing in those profits (in this case 10% of them.)
Of course that is assuming the U.S Government is itself providing public goods.
This is essentially the basis of state-owned enterprises.
Plus as ownership increases and the SOE's are therefore more democratically embedded there is more public influence.
So yeah, I think public ownership is good in itself and not just "glorified welfare for big business." It's a much better solution compared to the generous loans and bailouts we saw in the Great Recession, for example.
It just sucks that Trump is doing it for his crony self-interest.
Last edited by sc94597 - on 27 August 2025