By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - Sydney Sweeney does an ad for jeans, media throws a hissy fit

zorg1000 said:
Chrkeller said:

How we got here doesn't change the fact we are here.  Middle America doesn't like handouts.  What was Reagan's famous words?  something like the scariest words in the english language is "we are the government and are here to help."  Fact is handouts, with middle americans, haven't been popular in 40 years.  

Except, they still largely are popular. Medicaid is popular, Medicare is popular, ACA subsidies are popular, Social Security is popular, child tax credit is popular, food stamps are popular, unemployment insurance is popular, having a minimum wage is popular, disability insurance is popular, Pell Grants are popular, school meal programs are popular, crop insurance is popular, small business grants are popular, FHA loans are popular, etc. 

People are fine with getting assistance because they believe themselves to be hard workers who pay into the system, therefore deserving of it. At the same time, they have been conditioned to believe there is a large number of freeloaders, taking advantage of the system and stealing the benefits from the hard workers.

Middle America loves receiving handouts, they don’t like people they feel are beneath them receiving benefits and use “bootstrap” mentality to justify why they deserve them but others don’t.

SS and Medicare are not handouts.  Most people pay into those programs their entire careers and simply get a portion of their money back.  

Food stamps are not popular nor is medicaid.  Most middle Americans have no issues gutting those programs.  

We will have to agree to disagree because we clearly live in two different words.

And none that changes the fact that 12,000,000 people chose not to endorse Harris....  "because stupid" doesn't explain that massive drop out.  Not aligning with the candidate and not loving liberal policies does explain it. 

I mean how many swing states did harris pickup?  None?  Oh, but that darn Electoral College...  oh wait, she lost the popular vote too.  

Conclusion, the platform is loved isn't logical, full stop.  

Last edited by Chrkeller - on 18 August 2025

i7-13700k

Vengeance 32 gb

RTX 4090 Ventus 3x E OC

Switch OLED

Around the Network
Chrkeller said:

And none that changes the fact that 12,000,000 people chose not to endorse Harris....  "because stupid" doesn't explain that massive drop out.  

Just to be clear, the people who did not support Harris are also stupid, but for completely different reasons: Apathy. They are not the same group we were discussing earlier. Harris lost 6 million votes compared to Biden, not 12, and those votes did not necessarily go to Trump either. Trump gained 3 million new votes compared to Biden's election, but a large portion of those were first-time voters aged 18–24

Biden won by 65–35, while Harris won by 54–43 a very significant difference. There was a swing to the right, but it was not that substantial. If a person believes social programs are just charity handouts, there's a high chance they have been consistently conservative, right-wing, and voting Republican for quite some time. The main issue was mostly Democrats and independents not voting for Harris, rather than a large swing toward Trump

Edit: There is a group that turned to the right and for Trump though: Latin community, specially latin men. Quite amusing if you ask me, considering how Trump is treating immigrants 

Last edited by IcaroRibeiro - on 18 August 2025

Looks like this little controversy did nothing for Sweeney's new movie which just opened this last weekend, and then bombed.

Gotta be the genes.

Sidney Sweeney's AMERICANA was ignored by audiences, debuting with just $500k in 1,100 venues, just $455 per.

— Exhibitor Relations Co. (@ercboxoffice.bsky.social) August 17, 2025 at 9:59 AM



IcaroRibeiro said:
Chrkeller said:

And none that changes the fact that 12,000,000 people chose not to endorse Harris....  "because stupid" doesn't explain that massive drop out.  

Just to be clear, the people who did not support Harris are also stupid, but for completely different reasons: Apathy. They are not the same group we were discussing earlier. Harris lost 6 million votes compared to Biden, not 12, and those votes did not necessarily go to Trump either. Trump gained 3 million new votes compared to Biden's election, but a large portion of those were first-time voters aged 18–24

Biden won by 65–35, while Harris won by 54–43 a very significant difference. There was a swing to the right, but it was not that substantial. If a person believes social programs are just charity handouts, there's a high chance they have been consistently conservative, right-wing, and voting Republican for quite some time. The main issue was mostly Democrats and independents not voting for Harris, rather than a large swing toward Trump

Edit: There is a group that turned to the right and for Trump though: Latin community, specially latin men. Quite amusing if you ask me, considering how Trump is treating immigrants 

Good job on the fact-checking. That the 12 million figure was taken and run with demonstrates confirmation bias.

I agree with you that not supporting Harris was also stupid, but I wouldn't explain that with apathy. I'd call it dissatisfaction with the Biden administration coupled with the intent to teach Democrats a lesson by refusing to vote for them; the basic reasoning for this kind of voters being that they didn't want to reward a political party they weren't happy with. They didn't go as far as voting for Trump because they knew he would be worse, they chose to simply not show up.

But this is stupid behavior in a two-party system. The intent was to punish a political party, but the thing is that life just goes on for politicians. They are wealthy and will hardly be affected in any significant way which explains why so few Democrats have bothered to stand up against Trump in any meaningful capacity. The non-voters themselves, however, will face the consequences because they aren't as well off as the people they wanted to punish. They wanted to hurt the Democratic party and ended up hurting themselves. And again, that's the definition of stupidity, that your own actions end up hurting you.



Legend11 correctly predicted that GTA IV will outsell Super Smash Bros. Brawl. I was wrong.

Chrkeller said:
zorg1000 said:

You can’t go on about culture then also be like “don’t bring up history!” Culture & history are directly linked, you have to look at history in order to understand when, how and why something becomes a part of that culture.

”Middle America” does not have some long standing culture of not taking government “charity” like your previous post claims.

The golden age of capitalism and the creation of the middle class was in a time period when the government was giving out the most “charity”. High taxes were used to create a safety net, subsidies, investments & regulations and it was very popular.

When did middle America start hating government “charity”? In the aftermath of the civil rights movement when black people started having equal access to all the “charity” that white people had grown accustomed to for decades.

Republicans were successfully able to convince a large part of the population that government “charity” was no longer being used for building and maintaining a thriving middle class but rather going to lazy, undeserving people who were collecting benefits from hard working Americans tax dollars.

Ever since then, Republicans have used boogeyman tactics to get people to vote against their best interests and get them worked up about an undeserving “other” whether that’s minorities, immigrants or LGBT people.

With all that said, it doesn’t mean everyone who voted Republican in 2024 is a bigot, like we talked about earlier, it comes down to messaging. After a couple years of high inflation, most Americans were not feeling good about the economy. Republicans were able to convince many of the low information voters that Democrats cared more about immigrants & transgender people than they cared about improving the lives of the average American. These people may not be anti-immigrant or anti-trans but it’s going to be hard to convince people that immigrant/trans rights are the most important issue when they are struggling themselves.

Now ~7 months into this administration, we are seeing tariffs & trade wars causing inflation to creep back up and slowing economic activity, we are seeing ICE raids and federalizing the National Guard turning the country into a police state where even citizens are getting abducted, locked up or deported and we are seeing spending cuts to healthcare & food assistance that will hurt millions of “middle Americans”.

The last 50-60 years has seen people regularly vote against their own best interest over culture wars like race, religion, immigration status, sexual orientation, gender identity, etc. not because of some long standing belief of being too proud to accept government “charity”.

How we got here doesn't change the fact we are here.  Middle America doesn't like handouts.  What was Reagan's famous words?  something like the scariest words in the english language is "we are the government and are here to help."  Fact is handouts, with middle americans, haven't been popular in 40 years.  

The thing is middle America does like handouts, they just do not like handouts that also benefit other groups they feel does not deserve it.  Trust you me, if the handouts were selective to only them, they would be all for it.  This is why the republican message resonate with that group so well.  forget how those services could help you in need, instead think about all the people who are using those services who do not deserve it.



Around the Network
Soundwave said:

Looks like this little controversy did nothing for Sweeney's new movie which just opened this last weekend, and then bombed.

Gotta be the genes.

Sidney Sweeney's AMERICANA was ignored by audiences, debuting with just $500k in 1,100 venues, just $455 per.

— Exhibitor Relations Co. (@ercboxoffice.bsky.social) August 17, 2025 at 9:59 AM

Now this would be an opportunity for Sidney and her marketing crew to go online have a bunch of people pretend to be liberals and than rant about the movie.  Next it would be posted all over the internet about how the liberals are trying to bully her and conservatives will go out in droves to watch the movie.  I know someone must be thinking this up right now.  Maybe I should call Sidney up and pitch this ideal.  Before long, she will be the icon of America after I get through.



Chrkeller said:
zorg1000 said:

Except, they still largely are popular. Medicaid is popular, Medicare is popular, ACA subsidies are popular, Social Security is popular, child tax credit is popular, food stamps are popular, unemployment insurance is popular, having a minimum wage is popular, disability insurance is popular, Pell Grants are popular, school meal programs are popular, crop insurance is popular, small business grants are popular, FHA loans are popular, etc. 

People are fine with getting assistance because they believe themselves to be hard workers who pay into the system, therefore deserving of it. At the same time, they have been conditioned to believe there is a large number of freeloaders, taking advantage of the system and stealing the benefits from the hard workers.

Middle America loves receiving handouts, they don’t like people they feel are beneath them receiving benefits and use “bootstrap” mentality to justify why they deserve them but others don’t.

SS and Medicare are not handouts.  Most people pay into those programs their entire careers and simply get a portion of their money back.  

Food stamps are not popular nor is medicaid.  Most middle Americans have no issues gutting those programs.  

We will have to agree to disagree because we clearly live in two different words.

And none that changes the fact that 12,000,000 people chose not to endorse Harris....  "because stupid" doesn't explain that massive drop out.  

https://www.kff.org/medicaid/poll-finding/7-charts-about-public-opinion-on-medicaid/

https://www.fmi.org/blog/view/fmi-blog/2025/05/12/americans-broadly-support-snap-and-oppose-significant-reductions

https://www.fah.org/blog/icymi-overwhelming-voter-opposition-to-medicaid-cuts/

https://apnews.com/article/poll-government-spending-medicare-medicaid-social-security-0ccb0538c06d715b43bbbcaa4a1348cf

Medicaid & SNAP are extremely popular.

You’re right that people pay into Medicare & Social Security, what you’re wrong about is them just getting a portion of that back. The average person collects more from these programs than they put into them.

I’m pretty sure we’ve already found common ground on whether people are stupid so I’m not sure why you keep bringing it up. Didn’t we just recently agree that the general population is low information voters who don’t closely follow or understand politics and largely vote based on vibes?



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.

@IcaroRibeiro
@RolStoppable

https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-millions-voters-kamala-harris-trump-election-1981954

12 million = 81.2 vs. 69.

If you have better sources please share



IcaroRibeiro said:
Chrkeller said:

And none that changes the fact that 12,000,000 people chose not to endorse Harris....  "because stupid" doesn't explain that massive drop out.  

Just to be clear, the people who did not support Harris are also stupid, but for completely different reasons: Apathy. They are not the same group we were discussing earlier. Harris lost 6 million votes compared to Biden, not 12, and those votes did not necessarily go to Trump either. Trump gained 3 million new votes compared to Biden's election, but a large portion of those were first-time voters aged 18–24

Biden won by 65–35, while Harris won by 54–43 a very significant difference. There was a swing to the right, but it was not that substantial. If a person believes social programs are just charity handouts, there's a high chance they have been consistently conservative, right-wing, and voting Republican for quite some time. The main issue was mostly Democrats and independents not voting for Harris, rather than a large swing toward Trump

Edit: There is a group that turned to the right and for Trump though: Latin community, specially latin men. Quite amusing if you ask me, considering how Trump is treating immigrants 

As a non American, I keep being surprised. Did not know Harris won. But perhaps you mean the age group 18-24 only?

The reason more of the latin community voted Trump is logical. People that went through the arduous process in becoming a citizen, which probably took years, do not appreciate others taking a shortcut. It's really that simple. Legal vs. Illegal immigration.



Tober said:

@IcaroRibeiro
@RolStoppable

https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-millions-voters-kamala-harris-trump-election-1981954

12 million = 81.2 vs. 69.

If you have better sources please share

https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/statistics/elections/2024

Kamala had 75 million votes



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.