By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - 2024 US Presidential Election

EricHiggin said:

“I don’t know whether the marriage failed and the relationship survived or vice versa, but something very valuable lasted,” Brown wrote in his own 2008 autobiography, explaining that he and his wife had celebrated their 50th anniversary in 2007, although they hadn’t lived together in 25 years. So, they're divorced, but not divorced then?

Plenty of research? The medical professionals, especially Fauci were saying a vax wouldn't be ready for at least 4 years. It was ready in less than 1 year. MNRA isn't designed to be used in the manner it was. So no, there was not plenty of research done. All the heart problems since should be another clear indicator.

Assuming I was being misogynistic when I was clearly just making a Trump vs Kamala point could be viewed as misandry. Is that the case?

Divorce is not the same thing as separation. 

Separation is ending the relationship, and divorce is a legal process that requires filing. Plenty of people get separated first and start dating other people during the divorce process. 

Fauci said no such thing. Fauci said it would likely take 12 - 18 months. 

Trump made the claim:

Trump said: "We got a vaccine in nine months, Laura, and it was supposed to take five years. Fauci said it's probably never going to happen. I mean, Fauci was saying three years, four years, five years—a lot of people said 12 years. And I got it done in nine months. It's really a great accomplishment."

Among Fauci's earliest references to the development timeline for potential vaccines against what was then widely referred to as the "novel coronavirus" came in an article published by biotech industry news website Biocentury on January 22, 2020—soon after the first COVID-19 cases were reported in the United States.

"We likely will be able, unless there are unanticipated roadblocks, to start a Phase I trial in about three months," Fauci told BioCentury. 

Fauci said that the fastest a vaccine could be ready for use on an emergency basis was one year, although the process could take up to two years, BioCentury reported.

https://www.newsweek.com/dr-fauci-donald-trump-covid-vaccines-fact-check-years-develop-1579083

>Trump vs Kamala point

Again, the misogyny part had nothing to do with Covid. And you didn't say anything about Trump, when you are talking about Harris's relationships. 



Around the Network
the-pi-guy said:
EricHiggin said:

“I don’t know whether the marriage failed and the relationship survived or vice versa, but something very valuable lasted,” Brown wrote in his own 2008 autobiography, explaining that he and his wife had celebrated their 50th anniversary in 2007, although they hadn’t lived together in 25 years. So, they're divorced, but not divorced then?

Plenty of research? The medical professionals, especially Fauci were saying a vax wouldn't be ready for at least 4 years. It was ready in less than 1 year. MNRA isn't designed to be used in the manner it was. So no, there was not plenty of research done. All the heart problems since should be another clear indicator.

Assuming I was being misogynistic when I was clearly just making a Trump vs Kamala point could be viewed as misandry. Is that the case?

Divorce is not the same thing as separation. 

Separation is ending the relationship, and divorce is a legal process that requires filing. Plenty of people get separated first and start dating other people during the divorce process. 

Fauci said no such thing. Fauci said it would likely take 12 - 18 months. 

Trump made the claim:

Trump said: "We got a vaccine in nine months, Laura, and it was supposed to take five years. Fauci said it's probably never going to happen. I mean, Fauci was saying three years, four years, five years—a lot of people said 12 years. And I got it done in nine months. It's really a great accomplishment."

Among Fauci's earliest references to the development timeline for potential vaccines against what was then widely referred to as the "novel coronavirus" came in an article published by biotech industry news website Biocentury on January 22, 2020—soon after the first COVID-19 cases were reported in the United States.

"We likely will be able, unless there are unanticipated roadblocks, to start a Phase I trial in about three months," Fauci told BioCentury. 

Fauci said that the fastest a vaccine could be ready for use on an emergency basis was one year, although the process could take up to two years, BioCentury reported.

https://www.newsweek.com/dr-fauci-donald-trump-covid-vaccines-fact-check-years-develop-1579083

>Trump vs Kamala point

Again, the misogyny part had nothing to do with Covid. And you didn't say anything about Trump, when you are talking about Harris's relationships. 

Relationships don't require marriage. A failed marriage is divorce. You can say its a legal thing but how is being separate from a previous marriage really any different from being separate from a deeply loved relationship, or someone you had a child with, etc?

Could've been Bill Gates instead of Fauci. I remember watching one of the big individuals in the medical sphere say it on the news, and it was before the Warp Speed program was initiated and well on its way. I remember well, because I also knew that meant whoever won the 2020 election would be plagued with an entire term of dealing with Covid. This is the closest thing I can find at the moment, where Bill is saying it was being fast tracked down to a year and a half or two possibly. Meaning it typically would take longer, which is why they would've been inclined to say it would take at least 4 years, before Warp Speed was making reasonable progress.

Bill Gates On How Quickly We Could See A Coronavirus Vaccine | MSNBC - YouTube

Again? What was the context of the conversation I was replying to? Does context not matter?

Last edited by EricHiggin - 2 days ago

So this is apparently the internal house projection of the Biden campaign a couple of months ago. 270 seats is only 20 away from a super majority.  Wow



BFR said:

Well said, Chrkeller, well said.

Chrkeller said:

(From Page 2 of this thread, 3rd post)

Final results.......

Bottom line: Kamala could not add a single Electoral College vote to her "guaranteed" 226 from the start of her Presidential run.

All that campaigning she did, for the last few months, was for nothing.

Wait, what exactly are you praising here? He didn’t make a prediction, he just stated the obvious that it would come down to the swing states and listed the 3 biggest ones.

The consensus among basically everyone was the safe/likely totals were Harris-226 vs Trump-219 and it would require winning the right combination of the 7 swing states to decide the outcome.



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.

sc94597 said:

So this is apparently the internal house projection of the Biden campaign a couple of months ago. 270 seats is only 20 away from a super majority.  Wow

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4jxUSq-MV8



or was it?

His wife went full red when she went to vote.
Joe when he went to vote, stood with a group of maga decked out guys going in.

Trump has a breakfast meet with him?

Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out true.
He got backstabbed, and then decided to scorch earth, was the policy.

Last edited by JRPGfan - 2 days ago

Around the Network
sc94597 said:
Chris Hu said:

Well, both the Democrats and Republicans have shifted further to the right so politically speaking the left doesn't really exist in the US anymore not on a national level anyway. 

Yep, pretty much. This is a chart I made a few years ago, and it still pretty much applies. 

The Democratic Party is mostly a centrist party, especially on economics. Maybe less so on cultural issues. 

Interesting chart. Where would you put Nationalistic Socialist?

Also having communist and anarchists so close to each other looks weird. They should be polar opposites. The one where the state is supreme vs. the rejection of it.

Last edited by Tober - 2 days ago

JRPGfan said:
sc94597 said:

So this is apparently the internal house projection of the Biden campaign a couple of months ago. 270 seats is only 20 away from a super majority.  Wow

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4jxUSq-MV8



or was it?

His wife went full red when she went to vote.
Joe when he went to vote, stood with a group of maga decked out guys going in.

Trump has a breakfast meet with him?

Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out true.
He got backstabbed, and then decided to scorch earth, was the policy.

Not to mention he put on the maga hat a few weeks back and made absolutely sure the cameras were watching. 



LegitHyperbole said:
JRPGfan said:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4jxUSq-MV8



or was it?

His wife went full red when she went to vote.
Joe when he went to vote, stood with a group of maga decked out guys going in.

Trump has a breakfast meet with him?

Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out true.
He got backstabbed, and then decided to scorch earth, was the policy.

Not to mention he put on the maga hat a few weeks back and made absolutely sure the cameras were watching. 

You guys are jumpin' into conspiracy again. If you think this is what happened wait for a tell-all book with some evidence or something until then it's just nonsense. 



...

Tober said:

Interesting chart. Where would you put Nationalistic Socialist?

Also having communist and anarchists so close to each other looks weird. They should be polar opposites. The one where the state is supreme vs. the rejection of it.

That's why placing all the political spectrum in a single line doesn't work.

Not only on the left, Millei and Trump, for instance, are both right-wing populists but very different in their economic ideas.



 

 

 

 

 

zorg1000 said:

Wait, what exactly are you praising here? He didn’t make a prediction, he just stated the obvious that it would come down to the swing states and listed the 3 biggest ones.

The consensus among basically everyone was the safe/likely totals were Harris-226 vs Trump-219 and it would require winning the right combination of the 7 swing states to decide the outcome.

Face it, zorg. The Trump win did make people dumber, so the quality of discussion in here has degraded significantly since his win was announced. Hence why being able to do the most basic maths - which everyone was able to - is earning praise now.

EDIT: Funny video from SNL.

Last edited by RolStoppable - 2 days ago

Legend11 correctly predicted that GTA IV will outsell Super Smash Bros. Brawl. I was wrong.