By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
the-pi-guy said:
EricHiggin said:

Trump vs Kamala is misogyny? Wait what?

Nope. The divorce didn't happen until after Kamala.

Did Kamala Harris Have an Extramarital Affair with Willie Brown That Boosted Her Career? | Snopes.com

Posts Mislead About Harris' Romance with Willie Brown - FactCheck.org

Nowhere near enough solid competent research had been done by the time Kamala got the vax, not even 14, yet she took it anyway. Why?

But hey, Biden also took the vax the same week Kamala did, and he also said he wouldn't take the Trump vax. Is this misandry, or elderlyandry?

Lots of misogyny and misandry going around these days, apparently.

There was no divorce whatsoever. They had been *separated* for over 40 years, despite never filing any divorce paper work. 

Plenty of research was done on the vaccines, whether you believe or not. They went through clinical trials, among other things. 

The Covid part has nothing to do with misogyny. All the assumptions about her relationship stuff and blaming her for ruining someone else's marriage, could definitely be viewed as misogynistic. 

“I don’t know whether the marriage failed and the relationship survived or vice versa, but something very valuable lasted,” Brown wrote in his own 2008 autobiography, explaining that he and his wife had celebrated their 50th anniversary in 2007, although they hadn’t lived together in 25 years. So, they're divorced, but not divorced then?

Plenty of research? The medical professionals, especially Fauci were saying a vax wouldn't be ready for at least 4 years. It was ready in less than 1 year. MNRA isn't designed to be used in the manner it was. So no, there was not plenty of research done. All the heart problems since should be another clear indicator.

Assuming I was being misogynistic when I was clearly just making a Trump vs Kamala point could be viewed as misandry. Is that the case?