Sony has variety. Don't know why people would say they haven't. Nintendo and so y both lack in certain genres.

Sony and Ninty don't have a staple FPS.
Sony hasn't got a karting IP and Ninty hasn't got a Sim racer.

Both are creative. People forget Sony brought EyeToy to the market before Ninty released the Wii.
Ninty brought us Rumble.

Ninty gave us amazing puzzle games and platformers, Sony gave us the play create share games.

Both have massively given to the Industry, but the big difference is Ninty has been doing it for longer and their franchises like Pokémon, Mario and Zelda have such mass appeal, they go far beyond gaming. Mario is arguably bigger than Mickey Mouse.

Sony seems to be getting there now with the likes of Uncharted, God Of War and Spidey. It's a shame Sack Boys Big Adventure didn't make it as big as some Mario games. It was really well made and quenched my thirst of having to play a Mario game.

Another thing is number of studios that people put an emphasis on. Sony may have less studios than MS l, but their output is better and is still getting better. If you look at what Insomniac managed to release and ND and compare that to 343, The Coalition or even Bethesda, it's amazing. Even GG have done really well and SM have worked on several projects as support studios alongside their own game.

The only studio that has managed this sort of out put from MS is Playground games.

The organic growth model to bolster current studios, have synergy between them and new ones, and slowly bringing more I to the fold based on working relationships has massively benefitted Sony and their output.

Sony has variety. Don't know why people would say they haven't. Nintendo and so y both lack in certain genres.

Sony and Ninty don't have a staple FPS.
Sony hasn't got a karting IP and Ninty hasn't got a Sim racer.

Both are creative. People forget Sony brought EyeToy to the market before Ninty released the Wii.
Ninty brought us Rumble.

Ninty gave us amazing puzzle games and platformers, Sony gave us the play create share games.

Both have massively given to the Industry, but the big difference is Ninty has been doing it for longer and their franchises like Pokémon, Mario and Zelda have such mass appeal, they go far beyond gaming. Mario is arguably bigger than Mickey Mouse.

Sony seems to be getting there now with the likes of Uncharted, God Of War and Spidey. It's a shame Sack Boys Big Adventure didn't make it as big as some Mario games. It was really well made and quenched my thirst of having to play a Mario game.

Another thing is number of studios that people put an emphasis on. Sony may have less studios than MS l, but their output is better and is still getting better. If you look at what Insomniac managed to release and ND and compare that to 343, The Coalition or even Bethesda, it's amazing. Even GG have done really well and SM have worked on several projects as support studios alongside their own game.

The only studio that has managed this sort of out put from MS is Playground games.

The organic growth model to bolster current studios, have synergy between them and new ones, and slowly bringing more I to the fold based on working relationships has massively benefitted Sony and their output.

Very simple OP,  just answer:

-The top selling games of each system?

-Who can survive just by 1st party alone?

They also helped with the concept design of Astral Chain.

@bolded: None of them.

Wii U era proved that Nin could still survive.

Not at all. The Wii U proved that Nintendo had to react, cut the console’s expected lifetime short, and come up with a new product because it didn’t take off and was definitely struggling.