Dulfite said:
Indeed. Though you wouldn't think their budgets were short before this looking at LM3. Maybe they will receive more funds to expand the team or create a new team to make more games or games quicker. I hope Nintendo let's them work with other ips that no longer have yes working on them. They are a talented enough studio that I would prefer they use their time on AAA experiences rather than low budget games going forward. |
Well I would say Insomniac also didn't seem to have issues to make big budget game, but still they needed Sony or in one case MS to finance their game. So perhaps with Nintendo having a direct seat on the company they can have even better financing and grow. But even if they don't need it it is good to secure the dev and avoid any purchase by competitor or similar. Also agree that it would be cool to see more dormant IPs getting a new entry than an IP that had a more recent one.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."