Mortal Kombat. Every single one of them were bad, until Mortal Kombat 9 came along in 2011.


Mortal Kombat. Every single one of them were bad, until Mortal Kombat 9 came along in 2011.
| curl-6 said: Resident Evil. Yeah I'll say it; it was pretty rubbish on PS1, the fixed camera angles and clunky controls made the 5th gen entries a chore to play. In the 6th gen however it blossomed, culminating in RE4, the best video game of all time. |
Did you play RE1-3 when they released or many years later?
Today, I agree with you. So much happened in gameplay and controls going from PS1 to PS2. It was sex playing RE1 in 1996 though.
| drbunnig said: I'd have to disagree with GTA and Resident Evil. I can certainly see the argument that they improved in the following generations, but no way the first few games are mediocre - bad. |
The first two GTA games were panned by critics and certainly weren't sales blockbusters. They were okay at best.
| drbunnig said: I'd have to disagree with GTA and Resident Evil. I can certainly see the argument that they improved in the following generations, but no way the first few games are mediocre - bad. |
I remember Resident Evil 1-2 being a huge deal back in the day, so yeah, I'd agree with you.
Replicant said:
Did you play RE1-3 when they released or many years later? Today, I agree with you. So much happened in gameplay and controls going from PS1 to PS2. It was sex playing RE1 in 1996 though. |
I played them later, in the 6th gen. Still, I've never liked those kind of fixed camera angles in any game, I just find them so awkward.
RE in the 5th gen to me always felt like a great idea where the execution, and to an extent the technology, just wasn't there yet.
Last edited by curl-6 - on 28 September 2020uncharted 1 was by no mean garbage but it was short and has no replayability multiplayer shiz,
then uncharted 2 came out and blew everybody's expectation
SanAndreasX said:
The first two GTA games were panned by critics and certainly weren't sales blockbusters. They were okay at best. |
Average score (according to wiki at least) for the first two games were both around high 60 - low 70%, which is hardly a critical panning, although I gather these scores were likely only based on a handful of reviews. Regardless, I wouldn't personally use sales or review scores to judge whether I thought a game was good or not, but we're probably approaching this from a different perspective.
| Ka-pi96 said: I thought of one! Dynasty Warriors. The 1st game was a mediocre fighter on PS1. Then on PS2 it changed completely with DW2 and then really hit it's stride with DW3. Effectively created a whole new genre even. |
I came here to say this.
Guess I have to pick something else.
Maybe I will go with Warcraft. Warcraft was meh, and then Warcraft II was better, and then Warcraft III a fantastic game, and lastly World of Warcraft. A game too good for its own good.
I don't think I've ever seen such a huge step up in quality than God Of War. Hated 1-A.
You can count Killzone I guess but I find the series very overated. The first one was terrible, second one OK. I liked the 3rd one the most.
