By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - J.K. Rowling Writes about Her Reasons for Speaking out on Sex and Gender Issues

There seems to be two conversations going on here.

1. People can date whoever they want. That is true.

2. Trans people and their partner(s) doesnt owe anyone anything or need to tell anyone about their sex life. That is true.


So why the anger? We all agree.



Around the Network
RenCutypoison said:
Ka-pi96 said:

@1st bold When it comes to the person you're dating, yes they fucking are!

@2nd bold Not only is perfectly acceptable to define potential dating/sexual partners (or not) based on your own sexuality (like, what else would you even base it on?) but I have no doubt at all that you do the exact same thing.

1) Except no trans peeps should someone who thinks that (that'll end badly), and the POV isn't into trans'. If you're not intimate with the person, you don't have to have any knowledge of their genitalia.

2) This has nothing to do with how you see your partner and everything to do with how people here are talking about trans people when they are 1, cis, and 2 apparently not attracted to them, so not concerned at all by trans people in the dating pool.

bolded: i have no reason to talk about my sexuality here, has it has nothing to do with the subject.

You were the one that brought your sexuality to the thread.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

DonFerrari said:
RenCutypoison said:

1) Except no trans peeps should someone who thinks that (that'll end badly), and the POV isn't into trans'. If you're not intimate with the person, you don't have to have any knowledge of their genitalia.

2) This has nothing to do with how you see your partner and everything to do with how people here are talking about trans people when they are 1, cis, and 2 apparently not attracted to them, so not concerned at all by trans people in the dating pool.

bolded: i have no reason to talk about my sexuality here, has it has nothing to do with the subject.

You were the one that brought your sexuality to the thread.

I haven't talked about my sexuality at any point.

I implied being trans at some points.



Ka-pi96 said:
RenCutypoison said:

That's the whole point. The focus on genitalia (once again, none of your fuckin business except for the trans people you are intimate with) is toxic.

Sexual attraction isn't even based on genitalia. OBVIOUSLY, if you have a problem with the other person genitalia don't fuck them. But that shouldn't be a discussion in a transphobia related thread. Cis people here care moren about trans genitalia than most trans people.

Same shit with the whole pre-op/post-op dichotomy. It's a very personal thing, and most trans people won't tell their coworkers which surgery they had but somehow that's relevant to random internet people ? 

Which surgery btw ? That's a usually a good question for cis peeps.

Then you must have missed the whole point since it was quite clearly a post about people that you would be intimate with, so genitalia does matter.

You really need to get over your entitlement though. If people don't want to date/fuck you for whatever reason then they have every right to say no. You're not entitled to them.

There is 7 Billion people in the world each with different physical and mental attributes.

We likely only get potentially attracted by 1-10% of that population each, and it is mostly based on silly things like hair color, skin collor, height, weight, etc. Most doesn't really mean anything in the end, some can potentially mean for procriation, we are still based on those instincts of viable and healthy offspring. But no sane person will say that you have 10 different phobias to justify you not getting atracted by the other 90-99% of people in the world.

Myself I rarely find a black girl attractive, but have dated some and they were just gorgeous. My taste is mostly for blonde blue eyed, still I married, love and find gorgeous my japanese-italian descendent wife. That have nothing to do with biggotry, it is just what visually attract us at the first moment, then on second moment we are going to learn more about that person and truly generates feelings and pursue a relationship. Anyone trying to neglect visuals for first contact or trying to portray that as discrimination is basically wrong. Also sure that anyone that only concerns with physical appearance and neglects all the other features of a partner is quite dumb as well.

Summary, only the person know why or what attracts him and labeling that person because of that person's reasonings is just wrong.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

RenCutypoison said:
DonFerrari said:

You were the one that brought your sexuality to the thread.

I haven't talked about my sexuality at any point.

I implied being trans at some points.

And being trans have nothing to do with your sexuality?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Around the Network
DonFerrari said:
RenCutypoison said:

I haven't talked about my sexuality at any point.

I implied being trans at some points.

And being trans have nothing to do with your sexuality?

YES

This is the one thing most sociologists, feminists and psychiatrists have concluded from the past 50 years of gender studies.

Also I'm asexual so the idea that anything impacts my sexuality is quite comedic to me.



The issue I see with Rol's thought process is not that one is defining who they would date based on some criteria, but that that dating criteria is how you define who is and isn't a woman.

"what stood out is the statement that transgender women are women.

Simply ask yourself if you would draw a line between dating women and transgender women; if you are honest about it, the chance is higher than 99% that you will draw a line. At least I hope I am correct in assuming that 'transgender woman' means that a penis is still attached to such a person."

So basically transgender women can't be women because 99% of cis straight men wouldn't wanna fuck them and that's just "common sense"



...

RenCutypoison said:
DonFerrari said:

And being trans have nothing to do with your sexuality?

YES

This is the one thing most sociologists, feminists and psychiatrists have concluded from the past 50 years of gender studies.

Also I'm asexual so the idea that anything impacts my sexuality is quite comedic to me.

The conversation is exactly about transexuality. And you hinted at being trans.

Guess you are mixing it with sexual life and activity (that we aren't discussing and really isn't of anyone concern).

But to deny that being transexual have nothing to do with your sexuality is strange for me.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

RenCutypoison said:
DonFerrari said:

And being trans have nothing to do with your sexuality?

YES

This is the one thing most sociologists, feminists and psychiatrists have concluded from the past 50 years of gender studies.

Also I'm asexual so the idea that anything impacts my sexuality is quite comedic to me.

If you are asexual then none has anything to do with your sexuality but that's you so speak for yourself and not other trans people,when being trans it is often not clear what's in your pants(for others) when you are looking for a potential partner and then it is important to be honest about it.



Immersiveunreality said:
RenCutypoison said:

YES

This is the one thing most sociologists, feminists and psychiatrists have concluded from the past 50 years of gender studies.

Also I'm asexual so the idea that anything impacts my sexuality is quite comedic to me.

If you are asexual then none has anything to do with your sexuality but that's you so speak for yourself and not other trans people,when being trans it is often not clear what's in your pants(for others) when you are looking for a potential partner and then it is important to be honest about it.

That is true. You should always be honest about it. Just like people should be honest about having an infectious disease or having a criminal past or whatever. Not only because of the person you are trying to get together with, but for your own sake. Many trans people have been beaten up or worse because a straight man feel like they were fooled. Its dangerous to not be honest before you get intimate with someone.