Just a question, wouldnt next gen consoles help reduce the cost of using RT? The reason is because next gen consoles wont be able to use the full force of it, so developers will find ways to optimize it so that they can have while having other bells and whistle. My take we wont see the beenfit of proper rt until last year of next gen and early next next gen

Probably 60 fps 4k@.

Ah thank you, someone with knowledge on the subject. Is that truly it? No Naughty Dog games, Guerilla, Santa Monica? You know, the big AAA hitters. 

Because if Days Gone is the most high budget exclusive that uses UE, the irony here is delicious. 

Where do you guys get your information from?

Let me paste here the same answer I did in another thread:

"A number of different components are required to render at this level of detail," says Sweeney. "One is GPU performance and GPU architecture to draw an incredible amount of geometry. You're talking about a very large number of teraflops being required for this. The other is the ability to load and stream it efficiently."

Would this demo run on my PC with a RTX 2070 Super? Yes, according to Libreri, and I should get "pretty good" performance. For comparison, the PlayStation 5 GPU the demo video was captured on achieves 10.28 teraflops, while the RTX 2070 Super hits just over 9 teraflops. 

Regarding loading and streaming, though, Sweeney says that the PlayStation 5's SSD architecture is "god-tier" and "pretty far ahead of PCs," but that you should still get "awesome performance" with an NVMe SSD, which I'm using."

https://www.pcgamer.com/unreal-engine-5-tech-demo/

This is a piece of the PCGamer interview with Epic Games.

Thats even worse than I thought before, if its like the ps3 and ps4 demos, it means we will not get to see those graphics until late in the next generation. Full games never get to look as good as tech demos until years after.

Impressive what HW that won't cost more than $500 will be able to do.

If you think next gen consoles will be able to have these kind of graphics on open world games at 4k 60fps with full Ray tracing, you'll be hugely disappointed. This was just a tech demo, most likely ran on a PC.

Demos for the UE4 years ago also looked impressive and we never saw anything like that on ps4 pro or xbox X.

Most likely not a ps5 with only 10teraflops.

Great use of Irony. We all know PS5 isn't capable of those graphics at 4k, which will most likely be a demand for all next gen games. Even a current 2000dollars PC can't do that without heating issues, or huge fan noise, or frame drops.

Xbox series X could be closer to be able to, but it won't cost only 500dollars, I even have my doubts if PS5 will be only 500dollars.

And is the Xbox SSD faster or slower than the PS5? So you can continue the thinking process and just arrive to the conclusion that you are avoiding.

I'll say, PS5 SSD solution is better than MS (which is something that you would have on PCI 4.0 on PC) so the demo wouldn't be feasible in XSX without changes to make it work on XSX.

Will you also comment the supposition that Sony paid for Epic to lie about it, or that Epic hates MS even if MS uses UE much more than Sony, or you just have problem with the part that is favoring Sony in the discussion?

Did you even watched it? Because it is clearly said that the demo is running realtime on PS5 and then captured.