Thing is, Biden already had a 130k lead in Arizona with an esimated 82% of ballots counted. ~300k ballots later, his lead dropped to sub 69k.

Each political spectrum has different cultural and social values, different priorities. That’s what you ultimately vote for. If someone you don’t like is the only option, so be it, because it’s better then supporting the other side. 

Italics: That’s nothing compared to Dems having media, and entertainment industry in their pocket vilifying conservatives every day for 4 years. Im seeing people in the media literally saying Cuban voters aren’t Latino because they voted Trump. That’s blatant intolerance of opinion. 

In fact, I can remember when Bush Jr. touted that the US would bring democracy to the world. Most Europeans were thinking at the time "Who, you? Get your own democracy in order before trying to export it!" Or something around those lines. Especially ironic considering how he got elected in the first place...

Georgia update:

There should still be about 5,000 ballots left in Fulton, 6000 in Clayton, 17,000 in Chatham, and 7,338 in Gwinnett. And others from redder areas (which may not necessarily net Trump votes in *absentee* ballots.)

— Taniel (@Taniel) November 5, 2020

Give 2% of that to 3rd parties and Biden needs almost 70% of these ballots. If whatever is left in the red counties breaks even or favors Biden, he needs even less. But then provisionals and military absentees would determine the winner. Wow!

The second is not only factually sketchy, but completely dodging the point. 

So, let's focus on that first part.

Yes, what you vote for is representative of your values.

So, while one person on a message board doesn't fit your standard of tolerance, on the whole, there's no evidence that the Democrats are willing to endorse the kind of divisiveness embodied by Trump and many other prominent members of the republican party.

Basically, what I'm saying is that if you hold "random person on internet forum" to such high standards, you should probably hold equally high standards for the fucking president of the United States, and you should perhaps question the "tolerance" of those willing to vote for him, as vigorously as you're questioning the tolerance of the random person on the internet.

That is, if tolerance of the other party is important to you. If it's not, then fine. Just don't be a hypocrite and invoke "tolerance" to try and shut down criticism of republicans if you're not going to hold republicans to the same standard.

Assuming that's the case. It is still inexcusable that to no fucking end, they keep saying "Oh we found "x" more ballots. More coming in!" after saying there's only a certain number of ballots left. Majority of them, mail-in ballots. And it's pretty obvious where that will skew. This shit is happening across a lot of the current contested states and it's becoming really questionable. It's like they magically keep finding a sack of ballots under their sofa.

Who is saying that? I've been following PA and Georgia pretty dang closely and in both states, their announcements regarding the number of votes left to be counted has matched with the amount of votes counted since the last update. I haven't seen any significant shifts upwards. 

What election official (not a right wing propagandist) is saying they 'found' new ballots?

Great thread debunking the nonsense on social media, one lie at a time:

1/ ALRIGHT Y'ALL. ELECTION FRAUD DEBUNKING MEGA THREAD. I’m following claims of fraud and looking into them. I think I’ve solved most now. Nothing is holding up under any scrutiny so far so I’m making a thread to track in one place. Please RT! #ElectionResults2020 #Election2020

— Isaac Saul (@Ike_Saul) November 5, 2020

Apparently the Democrats have a secret hide-out under a french bakery somewhere in Pittsburg, where kidnapped Canadian tourists are working 24/7 printing new ballots.

True story.