Playsation shouldn't have marketed it on their twitter platform

That was strange for a "first" impression

Surprised by the specs. Also the variable clock speeds. Who knows what actual performance will be of the games are demanding.

This stream was a disaster. Now I know which one not to buy.

I'm sorry Sony, but this wasn't good at all.

I thought it's pretty obvious for everyone that a faster clock runs everything faster in a gpu....

We will see how this turns out looking at the games.

MS: Low clock, wide cu count vs Sony: Fast clock, small cu count. ("Low" and "Fast" relatively speaking).

Cerny did not mention anything about Raytracing hardware implementation (neither did MS). Everyone is expecting Ray Tracing to be "the next big thing" in games.

Generally said, there are things a gpu is very good at, not so good at, and bad at. Ray tracing is a thing a gpu is very, very, very bad at. A fast clock helps alot here. My initial guess is, looking at the numbers, XSX games might look a little better when RT is not used heavily, while PS5 games might look a little better the more RT is applied. Time will tell.

within 20% difference between the "Tflop" count, with a lot less CUs at a higher frequency. So price may be a lot smaller and the lost performance may not be that visible.

Xbox Series X: 2.4GB/s (Raw), 4.8GB/s (Compressed)
PlayStation 5: 5.5GB/s (Raw), 8-9GB/s (Compressed)

That's all i need to know. Holy Shit Sony, this SSD is freakin monster.

Shhhh, Tflops means everything to people.

Be interesting to see how Sony going double the speed on the SSD compared to XSX will play out.

You are wrong. They said the system can always run in boost mode. It will drop frequency if the game in question doesn't require that power.