Completely wrong. Having exclusives is the reason PS1/2 was dominating, is the reason the PS3 was able to gain traction and why the PS4 remains dominant. 

Exclusives -> larger userbase -> larger platform software sales -> larger sub counts -> more money to invest into exclusives and such

While PC fans will continue to port beg, realistically this seems more like a combination of Decima already being on the platform and Horizon 2 coming presumably soon.
I think Sony will realise that the small software sales they will get on PC are not worth the brand hit of losing exclusives.

The PS2 is considered the best selling console in history yet the 360 came out and halved Sonys Userbase.

The Wii was Nintendos best selling home console followed by there weakest selling in the WiiU.

Just because the PS4 sold so well doesnt mean its an autosuccess for the PS5. Those two points above prove my point.

Xbox is on the surge upwards, your lack of respect for the PS5s competitor is exactly what happen when the PS3 launched against the 360.

The console market is only so big, gamers will have more choices not less. The PS4 did not kill off its competition, it only created it.

Larger Userbase increases by increasing your audience not reducing it.

WiiU, Gamecube, N64, Dreamcast all had exclusives, what happened there?

Even if Horizon 2 is coming to ps5, all ps4 games will be backwards compatible on ps5, so every single ps4 exclusive will be a reason to buy a ps5. Sony shouldn't put either ps4 or ps5 exclusives on PC.

Ps3 would be another story because they will not be on ps4 or ps5.

The very reason why sony is ahead of xbox in sales is because of the exclusives, take that away and the market will change.

If it wasn't for ps4 exclusives, everyone would have gone to xbox X on sales. It has more power, smaller design, backwards compatibility and quiet fan and better services.

In fact I had left ps4 behind when I bought my X on launch day, the thing that made me come back was

1 - exclusive games (but xbox has great exclusives too, such as Recore, Gears 5, Forza horizon 4, Forza 7, Halo collection

2 - VR which was more impressive than I ever imagined, why is Microsoft not focusing on VR? Blows my mind that Sony has that huge advantage and Microsoft doesn't seem to care. It really is important, its the future, and sony is already miles ahead.

In fact the best gaming experience I've had for the past decade was playing table tennis on VR, nothing comes close to that fun. Its a huge step up, the same as when I went from SNES to N64 (2D to 3D)

So much so that if Xbox series X had more power, more exclusives and cheaper price, I'd still choose PS5 just for the next VR.

Wrong, playstation is destined to succeed no matter what, PS1, ps2, ps3 and ps4 were huge successes. The brand name alone guarantees it, even more next gen because its backwards compatible.

It doesn't matter the specs, or price or design, or quality or games, it will succeed, no questions about it. 

Xbox OG was a failure (25million vs 150million), xbox one too(50million vs 108million)), only the 360 was successful, and only because they had the cheap DVD with no wi-fi and no hard drive, and launched 1 year ahead of ps3. That won't happen this time around

But that 360 success is misleading, they had only 3 months warranty, and a lot of consoles were breaking due to RROD, so many of those sales were replacements, how do I know this? Because it happened to me, twice, I had the original replaced, and then the arcade version replaced, only my slim model survived. I'd go as far as to say at least 25 million consoles were replacements. So those 360 numbers were inflated, and even then ps3 outsold it anyway.

Here in Europe the 360 was 360euros, the ps3 was 600euros, and sony still outsold it with one year less of sales.

PS - Things could change if USA would conquer Japan, then xbox could have a shot at outselling the playstation. Maybe hundreds of years from now.

The PC ports are usually ps4 versions of those games, not ps3 versions, I hope you know Uncharted is on ps4. 

PS3 games are possible with a lot of work, I didn't say it wasn't possible, learn to read.

Just far too much work to make it worth it when those games are already very old.

Lets take a look at a game from ps3 which is not on ps4, metal gear 4, how many sales do you think it would have on pc? 500 000? Possible, but it would be at a much cheaper price, probably 30dollars, and it would take a lot of developer work to make it work.

The cell processor was very difficult to port.

Sure some emulators run ps3 games, but always with bugs, and you need a very powerful PC, and those hackers they work hard on it. How many years did it take for the Uncharted to run perfectly on PC? Does it even run perfectly? I doubt it, I will check that video and read the comments, I am almost sure people will be saying is not perfectly stable.

PS - Just saw the video, wow it looks worse than on my ps4, and gameplay looks dodgy, much smoother on my ps4, so why would anyone buy this if developers made it for pc? Looks outdated full of jaggies, it actually looks nicer on my ps4.

I cant explain it but that game seems to be dragging a lot, have you ever played on ps4? Much faster and smoother.

And that's running on core i9 lol How many people actually have those kinds of PCs, like I said, this thing wouldn't sell well on PC as specs would be high and it would take too much development effort.

After seeing this I don't believe it would ever sell 500 000 on PC, like at all.

Larger userbase as in more PS hardware sales.PS has no game selling platform on PC. Removing exclusives will do nothing but reduce hardware sales. It is nonsensical to say removing exclusives somehow leads to more people buying PS5 lol

All those consoles you mention were either unattractive hardware or had little third party support. Neither of these things has ever applied to Playstation so its a silly analogy. 

Obviously you didn't read my post. Like... At all.

Just because it has "Playstation" in the name, doesn't mean it will be a success. Playstation Vita anyone?

Doesn't matter if a console only sells 10 million or 100 million. Success is defined by how profitable it was.

Otherwise... To me as a consumer I couldn't give two shits about how many units a device sells, as long as I enjoy it.

I never said anything to the contrary. Perhaps you lack that fundamental skill that you criticize me for?

Majority are already on PC.

PC games have longer legs than console... Fable: The Lost Chapters will often hit the top of the Steam sales charts even after more than a decade, everytime it goes on sale.

On console that generally doesn't happen.

Not as much as you think it is.

The irony is... I have provided evidence, you have ignored the evidence and continue to try and push this assertion.

It's not as bad as you make it out to be.

The Playstation 4 cannot run the Playstation 3 version of the game, it's not an Apples to Apples comparison.

Wait until Playstation 4 emulation kicks off, it will look better on PC.

You do know I own consoles, right? Like allot of them?

An i9 isn't the fastest CPU.

An emulated game has nothing to do with a ported game, don't conflate the two.

Shit son, opinions. Outside of Odyssey, your list is garbage. Yay, an opinion.

Yeah how convenient, list is shit because those games are not on PC lol I bet you also said horizon was shit until they announced it for PC right? I bet if they port God of war and spiderman to PC then magically the games will be best of generation too lol PC gamers are silly.