I have no idea what that means

Maybe you should use context from his context in a recontext way to recontextualize your current construct of said situation.

Well damn, you make it sound so simple

That remaking games take longer now due to hd development and overall larger scale.

But does it?  They already have engines that they could use from Let's Go or Sword and Shield.  All of the Pokemon have 3D models from 3DS that could be updated, or models in Sword and Shield.  Other franchises that are much larger in scale have no issue doing annual installments, and those are larger in scale then Pokemon.

Nah, overpriced DLC is still leagues away from MTX on the scumbag level. When Bethesda came out with the underwhelming Operation Anchorage and Mothership Zeta DLC for Fallout 3 almost nobody complained. They just bought The Pitt, Broken Steel, and Point Lookout. Or waited for the GotY edition, which I remember launching for $40. 

The problem here is that GF actually thinks their DLC is worth $30. It's a sprinkling of updates ala BotW expansion pass, that should have been in the game already. If it was $20 like BotW's DLC I'd be fine with it. Or if it was essentially a whole other game like Xenoblade 2's or Three Houses' DLC content I'd be happy paying $30 for it. But no, it'll be two new wild areas and not much else. 

I agree that 30$ is better but I was confused by the ending, thought it was 30$ for each DLC =p.  

I looked over most of the improvements for these games. It really looks like just a bunch of minor improvements. 

That would suggest that you need $60 for both DLC sets combined. 

Thankfully Nintendo's Site says otherwise. 

Sw/Sh have separate passes so you get specific content for the version of the game you have that's what its referring to not the content.