A lot more and better, the really good RPG on N64 is Paper Mario 64 but that's still not enough compared to Wii RPG library

You mean Wii = night and N64 = day? Pretty balance, i see

I owned over 170 games on Wii, for both all ages and adults only, none of them are for casual only

You should tell that to PS VR with motion control

I already explained multiple times i referred to Nunchuk controls and not motion controls as a whole. I mantain what i said: "Nunchuk controls and its mainstream success were a fad". Wii sports kinda games sold a lot, and Nintendo has never come back to those games...It must be for a reason i think. Kinect with Microsoft was the same thing, it completely disappeared from Microsoft strategy. It went from being the next big thing for Xbox to completly forgotten. Would you agree with me that Kinect was a fad or not in this case?.

I will explain myself better....(Your numbers about SNES are wrong by the way).

What i meant to say it that the sales of SNES lasted longer comparatevely to their peaks, SNES FY1990-FY1998 , 9 years (and then it sold a few years more but barely nothing important); Wii FY2006-FY2014, 9 years too, so yes technically they lasted the same (or very close) officialy, but...Wii fell off way harder in the second half of their lives compared to SNES.

Peak year of SNES: 3rd FY, FY1992, 13'0M

Peak year of Wii: 3rd FY, FY2008, 26'0M

Years 4-5 for both:

SNES: 11'1M WW FY 1993, 4'4M WW FY 1994 (weird year drop by the way that year..., anyone knows what happened this year?)

Wii: 20'5M WW FY 2009, 15'1M WW FY 2010

Until this point, in effect, Wii was doing way better than SNES in total numbers and declining pace. But after year 5, Wii declined more than SNES in proportion:

Years 6-9 for both:

SNES: 5'8M WW FY 1995, 3'3M WW FY 1996, 1'9M WW FY 1997, 1'5M WW FY 1998. Total during FY 1995-1998 = 12'5M of 49'1M total lifetime = 25% of the sales

Wii: 9'8M WW FY 2011, 4'0M WW FY 2012, 1'22M WW FY 2013, 0'4M WW FY 2014. Total during FY FY2011-2014 = 15'4M of 101'6M total lifetime = 15% of the sales

When i said "Wii didn't last as long as the SNES" i meant Wii dind't mantain the pace as well as the SNES (relatively speaking) in the latter years. If Wii would've shared the same drop projection as SNES, Wii could've sold more than 115M in the end.

N64 by the way started stronger than SNES in NA and Others:

SNES lifetime total NA+Others FY1990-FY1994 = 22'1M

N64 lifetime total NA+Others FY1996-1999 = 25'7M

Japan was the main difference (it seems that losing FF and DQ franchises  to PS during those years was a mortal blow in Japan):

SNES FY1990-FY1994 = 11'8M

N64 FY 1996-FY 1999 = 5'0M

Then Nintendo stopped production to sell GC's. In that regard, i will understand if someone says my argument proves N64 was even more of a fad...., but i guess it was Nintendo's decision to stop N64 because the console wasn't working in Japan and because the general perception was that N64 could not compete to PS and the next to come PS2 so they tried to do something new . 

So yes, i admit Wii didn't disappear as quick as N64 or GC (after more heavy research), but it didn't last strong as long as NES, SNES, DS, 3DS either.... It was something inbetween. It's just that i'm pretty sure most people here (and everywhere else), if you were telling them in 2009 or 2010 that Wii was barely going to sell 100M in the end, no one would've believed that. No such a succesful console has dropped sales so fast ever.

^ this.

Also montion controll done right can feel amasing.
Resident Evil 4, with the Wii mote was the proper way to play that game.

The fact that its still around, and has a bright future with VR..... MC isnt a fad.

*edit:
Im happy the Wii is actually winning the poll.
Nostalgia is one hellva drug.... if not for so many of us, having found memorys of youth playing Mario 64, I doubt it would be this high.

Honestly looking back, alot of n64 games havnt aged well.... While alot of Wii games have (okay their not as old yet, but still).
I cant say I actually want to go play a n64 game atm, while I could easily find myself giveing Mario Galaxy 1/2 or Xenoblade Chronicles another.

To me this says the Wii wins this arguement, I dont live in the past.
present day, the Wii is a better system, and has better games (imo) since there's nothing on the n64 I want to play atm.

N64.

Because OoT and Mario Kart.

As much as I really enjoyed the Wii, during it's lifetime, the definite nod would have to go to the N64. Wii Sports was such a great system seller, but did it have the lasting impact of, say, Mario 64? Games like Mario 64, Ocarina of Time revolutionized 3D platforming/adventure, and they're basically the pioneers of much about modern gaming. Aside from the games, the N64 popularized analog controls, rumble, and made four player split screen a fixture. Also, thanks to games like Goldeneye and Perfect Dark, first person shooters were no longer confined to PC's (yes, I know that games like Doom, Hexen, Wolfenstein, and the like got console ports, but Goldeneye revolutionized fps's on consoles). Oh, and it also had Rare at their absolute peak!

The Wii had some amazing games--and it'd be easy to present the argument that Wii had a larger quantity of great games than the N64--but many of the games had gameplay that was made possible by the N64. Mario Galaxy 1 and 2 were amazing, yes, but they still ran off of the Mario 64 style, adding a touch of waggle in the process. LoZ Twilight Princess always seemed like a lesser take on Ocarina. Something about the Wiimote makes the console feel somewhat dated to me. Then again, the Wii did introduce the Virtual Console, which was a huge thing!

Honestly, though, the N64, Wii, and Wii U are my three least favorite Nintendo consoles.

The Wii has some truely great games I loved like Red Steel 2 and the No More Heroes games and 2 great Zelda games. And not to mention Metroid Trilogy (although technically I played these on the Wiiu) but the N64 had more of an impact on me and I still return to its games.

So GBA was a fad, too?