Bofferbrauer2 said:
I think you're too negative when it comes to Warren. She has attacked Bernie, that's for sure, but guess what? She has attacked everybody, and most other candidates got much more and harsher attacks from her. She's trying to dig up her own path, and to do so, she has to pass through Bernie, too. But she kept most of her furor for other candidates, as Bloomberg felt very well last night. |
I think you're being naive when it comes to Warren. When someone shows you who they are believe them, and she's shown me and the world that she's a snake. You don't do a he says she says accusing your friend of being sexist. The worst part is, she's a pathological liar, whose lied to advance her career all her life, yet somehow people still have faith in her. She's accused Bernie of having a super pac and claimed only she and Amy don't (she actually has 1). She's taken that dirty money all her life and only stopped once she decided to run for president. They've already invested in her and she'll be paying them back at some point and if you think that paying back the corporations isn't stabbing Bernie in the back and giving someone else the nomination if possible you're either naive, or not paying attention to how Warren moves.
I also don't want Warren in Bernie's administration and I'm not the only one. Even folks like the Humanist Report and Secular Talk who liked Warren have (finally) come around to her being the snake she is. So no, I'm not being too negative when it comes to Warren. She has HUGE RED FLAGS.
Follow my Gaming and Graphics Business on facebook and on Twitter:
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=101878997952596&ref=br_rs