mZuzek said:
PwerlvlAmy said:
Basically everything you said just agreed with me. 1. DKCR is a step down from the companies previous work. 2. Agreed with me that they're unfit to work on Prime atm(due to staff that made Prime what it is,being gone now). 2D is also way easier to do and your errors and mess ups are seen less in those games(you get more of a pass) than you would in a 3D game. We'll see what they bring to the table, but until then to me there's no valid reason to praise them for making this game and acting like its the same people of old that will be involved. People getting excited over the name recognition used for PR purposes.
It will be quite a long time now before this even comes to pass, if it even does this generation(based off Retro's current track record of making nothing recently). So were probably going to be having this debate for quite some time. But it is what it is.
|
Um... what. I literally didn't say any of that? Talk about cherry picking your arguments here.
1. Yeah I said DKCR was a step down, but I also said it was still a great game and that its successor, Tropical Freeze, was as good as anything the Prime trilogy brought us. 2. I didn't agree that they're unfit at all, in fact I said quite the opposite of that. The original staff being gone is a fact, not an opinion, my opinion is that that fact could hold little importance.
Also, lol at "errors get more of a pass in 2D games than 3D games", that has to be one of the most biased and unfounded arguments I've seen here. There's no reason mess ups are gonna be seen less in 2D games over 3D games, in fact I'd argue it'd be the opposite since there's a lot more stuff that can go unnoticed in a 3D game, whereas in a 2D one the level design has to be much more precise or else the issues are glaring. It's a dumb point to make, anyway, games are what they are and saying 2D games get a free pass is pretty much saying "I am biased and I want you to know it".
I agree the Retro move could have definitely been used for name recognition and PR, but to think Nintendo would just give them a game they're incapable of making after just giving up on a developer who was incapable is quite insane, it'd make no sense for them to not stick to the current guys if that were the case, or cancel the whole thing altogether. Everything we know about Retro in the last 5 years is rumors. What we do know for sure about Retro is that, regardless of whoever was at the company at any given time, they were always capable of putting out very high quality content.
|