super_etecoon said:
For some reason this is a circular argument. I am referring to the OP asking which Nintendo IP should go Mature. Mature is a rating. The things that get Mature ratings are the things I listed. Personally I don't want anyt of those things in a Nintendo IP, particularly the ones listed in the poll. I don't consider those "mature," but the ESRB and many posters here do. I'm with you...true mature doesn't need to involve those things I listed. But then Nintendo wouldn't need to worry about getting the ESRB to sign off on them either. |
No circular man.
If you go by M-rated attached to sex, drug, gore but accept the other themes being on Nintendo games we don't have a disagreement. You accept that there are several mature content not related to those, but that it wouldn't get a M rating. That is fine.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."