Aeolus451 said:
Again, to what extent do we defend as you put it? Are you suggesting we go to war over it? That's crazy. Do you have sources that's credible on those? I said that dems are using the russians' attempt to hack/influence our politics to discredit Trump. If Hillary won and the same info came, the liberal media would be quiet about it. I didn't mention the intelligence agencies at all. |
Okay so the reason everyone is snapping is because he said in front of Putin that the information that his OWN DNI Dan Coats said is up for debate. He said, "I asked Putin and he said no." as if that overrides the DHS, CIA, FBI and all other members of the intelligence community. Defending us in this case means not demeaning us in front of the Russia and the whole world. If something like this happened to Hillary (it did in the reverse actually) we would hope that she can at least get on the same side as the very men and women dedicated to protecting this country. What Russia did is threaten our right to our own representation. If we lose that we are in trouble. Even though this is the natural conclusion of hacking election boards, people are not really talking about it and I know why. The American public, people on both sides would ask 'what the hell are we even voting for if people can hack state election boards?' It creates a crisis on it very own.
The comment about the agencies was in response to your claim that no harm was done.
BTW, Trump just now is saying that he 'accepts the findings of the intelligence community' so at least he did that. Earlier this week when asked if he holds them responsible, he said he holds both countries responsible. That is something else that got people very upset. The responsibility is all Russia's unless he is insisting that Americans were also involved in the hacking which would make this far worse.