shikamaru317 said:
Soundwave said:
Both are better than any Star Wars film since 1983. Cameron is a better director than Lucas or JJ Abrams flat out.
|
We'll have to agree to disagree here. I'd 10 times rather watch any Star Wars movie again than watch Avatar again. It was so boring I fell asleep in the movie theater at one point, only time that has ever happened.
|
Cameron is a good director, but is very unoriginal. He really hasn't written anything good since Terminator 2. And his biggest box office successes have more to do with luck than his films. Titanic came at the height of Leonardo DiCaprio fever, so teenage girls were seeing the film over and over. I wouldn't say it's a bad film, but I haven't felt the need to watch it in more than a decade. I would have personally preferred something based on fact concerning that tragedy, not a fake love story.
As for Avatar, it was all the 3D hype surrounding the film, not the film itself, that made it a big hit. That and the newly emerging Chinese market was thirsty for any big spectacle film. If that film launched today, when there is no 3D hype and the Chinese are more selective, it would probably have done half of its original take. I mean, it really left no impact on society. No one knows the characters names, except maybe the general name of the aliens, Navi. There are no memorable lines from that film, either. I have yet to see a kid dress up as a Navi for Halloween. I think it's funny that Cameron thinks he can finish out his days making umpteen sequels to such a forgettable film, as if it will be his SW. Especially when said sequel is 10 years too late. Avatar 2 probably won't hit $1.4B, half of the original.
Last edited by thismeintiel - on 20 June 2018