No, the problem ehre is that you're basically challenging digital goodss and claiming them as objectively worthless. if you stopped at admitting you were being subjective, then it could have easily been written off, but no, you're heavily insisting that all digital goods are worthless and a waste of money.

The problem is the backers and people behind  the idea of 27000 USD for imaginary ships, I don't mind with digital goods  at all in fact i love digital goods, but digital goods that you defend is not even worth to defend 

You're basically crapping all over artists, musicians, novelists, and anyone else that sells their goods digitally.

You will not win that war. You will never win a shred of it, because everyone will tear you a new one, and rightfully so.

See, you are trying to make me look like I hate the artist that sell their music for 10 bucks, while in reality,  you the one who defend a shady artist that sell their product more than what they should have deserve.  Buddy  you defending the wrong artist , you have been scammed

People spend their hard earned money on what they want. It is not your decision to make, to tell people what they should spend their money on.

LOL, i am just commenting , I am not even care, how long have you been in Internet. "It called Forums " 

I think some rich folk are insane for spending so much money on fancy food, but guess what?, I don't care in the end because it's not my money, and even then their money goes towards the company they bought from, which in turn gets cycled around the world via purchases and payments to make.

That's great at least you admitted , but the problem is you seems defending the company

Also, people rent movies on netflix, millions of people do this, despite knowing full well that they do not own said media, but are merely renting it. The same way I know that our games are not legally mine, due to the fact that I am paying to make use of the license, to play said game. I do not own the code, nor will I ever. 

Yeah but not for 27000 USD 

Chazore said:

They paid for those digital goods out of their own choice. They chose what they wanted to choose. It is not your choice to make at the end of the day.

You are specifically trying to dismantle what people can/cannot buy and that is honestly not a battle worth fighting. 

Well I am not trying to convince them, i am trying to find any reasoning why would they?

You were just arguing against digital goods in general being a "waste", then you moved the goal post, and now you've moved it again.

You're now even calling the very artists who spent hours and weeks worth of their time to work on the game as "shady". Do you have any idea how asinine and ignorant that sounds?.

Did i mentioned every digital goods are waste, i bet you need to fix your reading glass. And also it's not " ignorant " it called  " sanity ",  I cannot find a sane person on earth that want to spend 27000 on imaginary thing.

"defending the wrong artist". No I'm pointing out how ignorant you're being about all of this and now you're going on a hostile rebound because you've been caught out on it. 

Which part of my comment hostile ?

If you didn't care this much, you wouldn't be here debating so very hard with me. If you didn't care, you wouldn't even be talking in this very thread, but you do.

Well the point of this thread is not to change people mind isn't ??? or maybe you just seems getting to serious defending this? 

Nah, it's called letting people do what they want with their money and not belittling and telling them how to spend it within "society". Big difference.

 In fact i don't care where their money goes or don't care with them nor this thread will be read by all their backers. My reasoning debating is more about why there is a person that defend this shady business  

We're on about the core concept here, not the goal shifting price.

That is even worse 

This is going down in the history books as my all time favorite thread.