|
Chazore said: They paid for those digital goods out of their own choice. They chose what they wanted to choose. It is not your choice to make at the end of the day. You are specifically trying to dismantle what people can/cannot buy and that is honestly not a battle worth fighting. Well I am not trying to convince them, i am trying to find any reasoning why would they? You were just arguing against digital goods in general being a "waste", then you moved the goal post, and now you've moved it again. You're now even calling the very artists who spent hours and weeks worth of their time to work on the game as "shady". Do you have any idea how asinine and ignorant that sounds?. Did i mentioned every digital goods are waste, i bet you need to fix your reading glass. And also it's not " ignorant " it called " sanity ", I cannot find a sane person on earth that want to spend 27000 on imaginary thing. "defending the wrong artist". No I'm pointing out how ignorant you're being about all of this and now you're going on a hostile rebound because you've been caught out on it. Which part of my comment hostile ? If you didn't care this much, you wouldn't be here debating so very hard with me. If you didn't care, you wouldn't even be talking in this very thread, but you do. Well the point of this thread is not to change people mind isn't ??? or maybe you just seems getting to serious defending this? Nah, it's called letting people do what they want with their money and not belittling and telling them how to spend it within "society". Big difference. In fact i don't care where their money goes or don't care with them nor this thread will be read by all their backers. My reasoning debating is more about why there is a person that defend this shady business We're on about the core concept here, not the goal shifting price. That is even worse |
