|
The problem is the backers and people behind the idea of 27000 USD for imaginary ships, I don't mind with digital goods at all in fact i love digital goods, but digital goods that you defend is not even worth to defend
They paid for those digital goods out of their own choice. They chose what they wanted to choose. It is not your choice to make at the end of the day.
You are specifically trying to dismantle what people can/cannot buy and that is honestly not a battle worth fighting.
See, you are trying to make me look like I hate the artist that sell their music for 10 bucks, while in reality, you the one who defend a shady artist that sell their product more than what they should have deserve. Buddy you defending the wrong artist , you have been scammed
You were just arguing against digital goods in general being a "waste", then you moved the goal post, and now you've moved it again.
You're now even calling the very artists who spent hours and weeks worth of their time to work on the game as "shady". Do you have any idea how asinine and ignorant that sounds?.
"defending the wrong artist". No I'm pointing out how ignorant you're being about all of this and now you're going on a hostile rebound because you've been caught out on it.
LOL, i am just commenting , I am not even care, how long have you been in Internet. "It called Forums "
If you didn't care this much, you wouldn't be here debating so very hard with me. If you didn't care, you wouldn't even be talking in this very thread, but you do.
That's great at least you admitted , but the problem is you seems defending the company
Nah, it's called letting people do what they want with their money and not belittling and telling them how to spend it within "society". Big difference.
Yeah but not for 27000 USD
We're on about the core concept here, not the goal shifting price.
|
