You do realize that not having a dynamic resolution when aiming for a given performance puts a different strain on the hardware, right?
Look at the strawman specialist in play he doesn't even remember the argument now, you said earlier DQXI is more demanding than doom because of the fps which we all know is complete bullocks. Not once did I mention Doom not needing to compromise visual fidelity to achieve 60fps at this point your desperation is present in trying to fabricate arguments to save face.
I said earlier that with optimisation DQXI could reach 60fps while still looking the same (not compromising visual fidelity) get your head out your ass because now I'm just going to be you're as clueless as the man in the white house here and trying to employ the same tactics as the said clown. The pure fact that you've gone down the route to start making shit up up to save face of your uninformed statement from before is not only outstanding but one I'll pull your card up on even if it leaves you bitter for months to come no wonder you post smiley faces and such in your replies that foolishness has more standing than pure fabrication and twisting.
You're here trying to make demands like some forum mogul but have not displayed a single thing detailing how DQXI is more demanding than Doom all you've done is make an awful declaration on 30fps and have danced around the debate like some fairy trying to look like you have some ground. From the get go your post was DQXI is more demanding because it runs at 30fps that is what you posted if you knew the were other factors you would never have posted it because you would have know that fps is one of a tonne of factors so don't give me that rubbish as after your card got pulled up on it you disappeared like Batman in the Doomsday fight and left VG to carry the debate and he actually brought something to it unlike you who vanished than pops up to post smileys perhaps you should stick to that.