By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Any gun nuts in here?

McDonaldsGuy said:
LuccaCardoso1 said:

You're right! Just look at every other country with gun control! They're all dictatorships! No, wait...

That's because of the USA.

Our victory in the Cold War saved Europe.

The UK is well known for dictatorships for example. In fact, it's the reason Americans thought guns were so important that the second amendment was the right to bear arms.

If it weren't for us and our guns, Europe would be a Soviet Republic by now.

You have to be trolling. I think you should know that the US isn't the only country in the world that has military. A lot of countries are very interested in keeping the US a democracy, they wouldn't just let someone create a dictatorship. And that the US doesn't really care about other countries being in a dictatorship if it doesn't directly affect them.

"If it weren't for us and our guns, Europe would be a Soviet Republic by now."
Do you know the concept of the Cold War? Cold War is named that because it didn't involve armed war (except for some minor isolated cases). US's money "saved" Europe from becoming a Soviet Republic, not US's guns.



G O O D B O I

Around the Network

I wonder. If guns truly are meant to rise against a tyrannical governement, why the fuck did nobody rise against Ajit Pai and his idiocy? His stupidity would cause severe damage to one facet of freedom of all US citizens and might even affect the rest of the world as well. Yet nobody stood up against him. So is it all talk and nothing more?

Please do not interpret this as me saying someone should threaten that guy. That's not what I mean.



Gameplay > Graphics

Substance > Style

Art Direction > Realism

GoOnKid said:

I wonder. If guns truly are meant to rise against a tyrannical governement, why the fuck did nobody rise against Ajit Pai and his idiocy? His stupidity would cause severe damage to one facet of freedom of all US citizens and might even affect the rest of the world as well. Yet nobody stood up against him. So is it all talk and nothing more?

Please do not interpret this as me saying someone should threaten that guy. That's not what I mean.

Could be because the majority of gun nuts can't even spell "internet".



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

Arming teachers will just result in more deaths. Either by teachers going crazy or by some crazy kid robbing the teachers gun and going crazy.



vivster said:
GoOnKid said:

I wonder. If guns truly are meant to rise against a tyrannical governement, why the fuck did nobody rise against Ajit Pai and his idiocy? His stupidity would cause severe damage to one facet of freedom of all US citizens and might even affect the rest of the world as well. Yet nobody stood up against him. So is it all talk and nothing more?

Please do not interpret this as me saying someone should threaten that guy. That's not what I mean.

Could be because the majority of gun nuts can't even spell "internet".

Must be that.



Gameplay > Graphics

Substance > Style

Art Direction > Realism

Around the Network
Kerotan said:
Arming teachers will just result in more deaths. Either by teachers going crazy or by some crazy kid robbing the teachers gun and going crazy.

See, this is why you need more guns. If every student had one then they could stop that crazy kid or teacher.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

McDonaldsGuy said:
Puppyroach said:
The problem I see in the 2nd amendment stance is that those who are for having semi-automatic or even fully-automatic weapons claim that it should be the right of the people to rise against a tyrannical government. Problem is though, what if those who rise up are the tyrannical ones! I mentioned in another thread the example from the Civil War in the US.

There was a situation similar to this.

Stalin, ZeDong and Hitler did definitely rise up, and took away guns from citizens as soon as they could.

Exactly and you don´t have any use of a 2nd amendment in those cases.



vivster said:
Kerotan said:
Arming teachers will just result in more deaths. Either by teachers going crazy or by some crazy kid robbing the teachers gun and going crazy.

See, this is why you need more guns. If every student had one then they could stop that crazy kid or teacher.

Yeah after some crazy teacher kills his whole class the solution will be to arm the kids. 

 

Reminds of the Simpsons episode where he gets addicted to his gun. 



Kerotan said:
vivster said:

See, this is why you need more guns. If every student had one then they could stop that crazy kid or teacher.

Yeah after some crazy teacher kills his whole class the solution will be to arm the kids. 



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

You make the exact point I do. The right to bear a band aid for a mortal wound.

Crowders Prove me wrong, goes into detail about government tyranny...it's like...are you serious?

Matter of fact... here's 10 automatics. Let's see what they'll do to a squadron of F-18s.



Insert Coin. Press START. You Died. Continue?