By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Movies & TV - The Fans Have Spoken, Last Jedi Drops A Massive 68%

pikashoe said:
mZuzek said:

Every single person who likes this movie has this condescending "you don't know what you're talking about" attitude, I love it. It never fails.

I don't really care if someone likes or dislikes a movie.  all i ask is that people display the issues with a film in a intelligent manner. A vast majority of the issues brought up here are untrue, nitpicky, exaggeration, or can be applied to the original trilogy. If most of this stuff was brought up with people involved with film making or critiscm, you'd be laughed out of the place. You dont have to like a film to appreciate its quality.

I don't personally like the godfather part 2 that much but I can still appreciate that it is a great film. Or I enjoy the room a great deal but I still am aware that it is terribly made.

You can dislike this film and that's fine it may have just not engaged you, but objectively its hard to deny that it's at least an ok film. People throwing around words like terrible and worst star wars ever aren't adding much to the conversation because it just comes across as silly exaggeration. 

Exactly, this guy gets it.



Around the Network

TLJ will finish its third week at the top of the US box office. It will not reach the heights of TFA but will likely end up in the top 30 of all time in the US when adjusted for ticket price inflation. When not taking ticket inflation into the equation, it has already entered the top 10 of all time in the US. I don´t think Disney are that unhappy with its performance.

Hopefully JJ Abrams can end this trilogy in such a way that both those who liked this film and those who disliked it can enjoy episode IX. Maybe that is something we all can agree on in this thread no matter what side of the opinion we stand?



mZuzek said:
Soundwave said:

Because nothing stands out as belonging in that class. And there's a good reason for that.

Yes, you're right, nothing I mention will belong in that class, and the reason is your opinion.

I mean, my favorite movie is Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, so what do I know? Clearly I have objectively bad taste.

I enjoyed Guardians 2, but a genre classic it isn't. Besides it's "cool" to hate on Marvel movies now, didn't you get the memo? Comedy iz bad mmmmkay.

BTW I was wrong The Dark Knight is a top tier film that most fans agree was great, so makes it basically 10 years since the last good "fantasy" film. 



Soundwave said:
Angelus said:

No, I agree that with this trilogy (or these two movie so far into it at least) they've made their bed, and now they have to lie in it. What I'm saying though, is that what happened here was clearly a step too far, just for the sake of trying to break from the established norms of Star Wars. Not just in a general sense, but also in terms of story beats, and expectations for payoff set up by TFA.

In the future, Disney needs to be more mindful of the continuity of Star Wars as a whole, and these big main saga movies. Like for starters, if you're gonna keep rotating through different directors for each movie in a trilogy, at least have them come together and agree on the main plot points, and themes that they wanna hit. That way you don't run into issues like here with Rain Johnson just being blatantly flippant of the entire script of the last movie (which of course, since it was basically a remake of New Hope, is thus by extension flippant of soooo much more that is dear to Star Wars fans).

In fairness to Rian Johnson ... 

JJ Abrams already established that Luke abandons his friends/family and basically allows the First Order to happen by running off to an island. There really is no good/satisfying reason for this to begin with. 

All Rian Johnson did was take that concept and probably take it to its logical end. 

Really there is no creative reason for these movies to exist. Not a chance would Luke/Han/Leia be dumb enough after all they went through to simply let their only blood relative to turn to the Dark Side because "they were too busy". 

The Skywalker Saga ends with Anakin Skywalker throwing the Emperor down that shaft. Any premise after that was always going to be flimsy. 

Except in TFA, Luke at least left a map so people could come find him. It left room for the possibility that he had retreated to this place, this ancient Jedi Temple, to learn some deeper knowledge of the force that could turn the tide of battle, or perhaps more realistically, to understand why everytime the Jedi rose to prominence, inevitably a Sith lord rises up to destroy everything. That he was trying to understand how to break the cycle. Idk, something along those lines. There's a myriad of ways one could have gone with it I'm sure. Rian Johnson though, decided to take it to an extreme, and just decide "meh.....Luke came here to be left alone and die. He didn't wanna be found." 

Moreover, JJ intentionally left a lot of leeway in his set up for the next guy coming in to play with. Did Ben Solo turn dark and burn down Luke's academy due to poor mentorship? Neglect? Was he seduced while Luke was away on some mission or other? Is the Jedi way fundamentally flawed? You could have taken it any number of ways, and Rian Johnson chose "......Luke, the guy who refused to kill Vader - who had been shown as nothing other than 100% evil to that point in the franchise - snuck into Ben's room at night, flip on his lightsaber, and in this setting, contemplate shishkebabing him." 



mZuzek said:
Soundwave said:

I enjoyed Guardians 2, but a genre classic it isn't. Besides it's "cool" to hate on Marvel movies now, didn't you get the memo? Comedy iz bad mmmmkay.

BTW I was wrong The Dark Knight is a top tier film that most fans agree was great, so makes it basically 10 years since the last good "fantasy" film. 

I don't care about it being a "genre classic". For all I care Ocarina of Time is worse than several other Zelda games that were never called classics either, and the same applies to a lot of things whether it's games, movies, books, music or whatever. A classic always has a sort of nostalgia attached to it, a level of glorification that is unearned - the most obvious example here being Return of the Jedi, a movie that is far from being amazing, yet is constantly hailed just because of the meaning it carries as the last in a classic trilogy.

Calling something a classic is only an attempt at finding a consensus of opinion, which is something that doesn't exist.

My point is the nerdy portion of the online "critics" community has gotten out of control. They don't like anything. 

The fact is if you really look at what the "good movies" are that they agree upon, it's a tiny list of like 10 movies, most of which are like 30 years old. 

Basically the only "good fantasy movies" from 1995 onwards is like The Matrix (1999), LOTR trilogy (2001-2003), and uh The Dark Knight (2008). Maybe an honorable mention to X-Men 2 (2003) and Logan (2016). 

At least the new Star Wars movies are on par/better than most of its modern contemporaries. I'd say the new Star Wars movies are as good as the Marvel films. 

Whereas the prequels were considerably worse than The Matrix and Raimi's Spider-Man films. Hell, the first Mummy movie felt like it captured more of the fun of the original Star Wars than the prequels did. 



Around the Network
mZuzek said:
Soundwave said:

Because nothing stands out as belonging in that class. And there's a good reason for that.

Yes, you're right, nothing I mention will belong in that class, and the reason is your opinion.

I mean, my favorite movie is Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, so what do I know? Clearly I have objectively bad taste.

Hey, I really liked that movie, too. Of course, that's the type of movie I expect from a Marvel film. A fun ride with good humor. The story also feels very important within its own universe. And going by user ratings and increase in BO takes, it seems a lot of people liked it, too. 

It's a shame Disney tried, and failed, to make TLJ GOTG Vol 3.



mZuzek said:
Angelus said:

Luke came here to be left alone and die. He didn't wanna be found.

I didn't even mind this development but the problem was the outcome. Humanizing Luke and showing his weaker self was an interesting idea, the issue comes when it has absolutely no pay-off and he just dies without doing anything meaningful.

He just had one of the most spectacular scenes of SW history before dying and rebels escape thanks to him. He is now one with the force, he'll come back as a ghost in the next chapter, is not all over.

Last edited by Goodnightmoon - on 30 December 2017

Puppyroach said:
TLJ will finish its third week at the top of the US box office. It will not reach the heights of TFA but will likely end up in the top 30 of all time in the US when adjusted for ticket price inflation. When not taking ticket inflation into the equation, it has already entered the top 10 of all time in the US. I don´t think Disney are that unhappy with its performance.

Hopefully JJ Abrams can end this trilogy in such a way that both those who liked this film and those who disliked it can enjoy episode IX. Maybe that is something we all can agree on in this thread no matter what side of the opinion we stand?

Of course. I want to see what it is done in ep IX.



Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever

Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe

DKCTF didn't move consoles

Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor

Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile


mZuzek said:
Angelus said:

Luke came here to be left alone and die. He didn't wanna be found.

I didn't even mind this development but the problem was the outcome. Humanizing Luke and showing his weaker self was an interesting idea, the issue comes when it has absolutely no pay-off and he just dies without doing anything meaningful.

The outcome, and the set up of it equally. Yes, it could have been interesting, if it was something along the lines of "ya. originally I came here to do so and such, so I left a map, but then eventually I realised it was all pointless/for naught/yadayadayada, so now I just wanna be left alone and die in piece." Transitioning to a character arc of redemption or return to glory or whatever. That's not what we got though



Angelus said:
mZuzek said:

I didn't even mind this development but the problem was the outcome. Humanizing Luke and showing his weaker self was an interesting idea, the issue comes when it has absolutely no pay-off and he just dies without doing anything meaningful.

The outcome, and the set up of it equally. Yes, it could have been interesting, if it was something along the lines of "ya. originally I came here to do so and such, so I left a map, but then eventually I realised it was all pointless/for naught/yadayadayada, so now I just wanna be left alone and die in piece." Transitioning to a character arc of redemption or return to glory or whatever. That's not what we got though

He does redeem himself basically by the end. I guess what difference does it really make if he physically shows up, Kylo has to kill him physically which is just is a retread of Han Solo dying at the end of VII.

Actually the moment Luke/Leia have there is really beautiful, Carrie Fisher adding that dialogue was great and very natural, it's one of the most touching moments in Star Wars. 

Generally speaking, having the OT characters in another trilogy was a mistake to begin with. Should've just passed on that, or killed all of them in VII to make room for an actual new story to be told. 

Last edited by Soundwave - on 30 December 2017