Kerotan said:
I'm sorry but in the real world that's how it works. It's the reality that Nintendo now have 1 console instead of 2. They previously could sell a home console and a handheld. Now they have a hybrid.
To them they will be comparing their sales to last gen. In Japan I believe they will fall short. WW I believe they can beat the Wii u and 3ds. So this is most certainly a fair comparison.
If they had made just a portable I'd compare it to the 3ds only. If they made switch home console only I'd compare it to Wii u only.
I know you don't take take kindly too these words because you are heavily favoured towards Nintendo but it's reality. Bravo is right. |
Each paragraph.
1) your basically doing the opposite. Your saying its a hybrid. So why would 2 switches have to replace 1wiiu and 1 3ds if switch is a "HYBRID". Wouldn't it be wiser to by "Kerotan" logic to subtract 13.5mil wiiu from 70mil+ 3ds? If your logic is true then it is the "Software" that switch needs to beat wiiu/3ds combine (franchises that have both counterparts). See that is realistic than your reasoning
2) If your comparing them then yes but nintendo never stated that they have to beat both combined. No offense but Switch is doing better for the company than the 3ds/wiiu combine. It doesnt matter even of it sells less. Because the most important thing for a company is "Profits". Would you rather sell 100mil HW and make nothing or sell 50mil HW and make $1,000,000,000? See the difference?
3) No comment
4) I dont take kindly to horrible logic. Sure its about nintendo but i wont argue if its true. If i did i argue with every1 saying bad things about nintendo. Not just you/Lawlight/DrVita/Quick (and a few others)














