habam said:
SuperNova said:
Nah, I don't think so. They'd be entering R&D around now and by the time it'd come out they'd be releasing the PS5 real soon, wich sort of defeats the purpose. The tech is also not nearly close enough to make a fully fledged PS4 portable, they'd have to go with a mobile chipset, wich again defeats the purpose. Also Nintendo probably has some sort of exclusivity deal on the Tegra line with NVDIA, wich means Sony would not have access to the most powerful mobile chipline going forward either. Unless they straight up go the Nintendo route and make their next console a hybrid, wich will probably sit inbetween the PS4 and the PS4 pro powerwise this just isn't technically feasable. And even then it's probably not a smart move.
|
Uhm X86 Chips in 4-6nm would actually work in a mobile form factor.
They wont use ARM tech for sure because that wouldnt allows compability with PS4.
The most powerfull ARM Mobile chipset is the Apple A11Bionic, not the Tegra x1 or Tegra X2. Even the Snapdragon 835 is pretty much in par with the tegra X1.
|
You missed the point of basically everything I said in my post.
I know 4nm X86 theoretically is energy efficient and cool enough to be put in a mobile formfactor. You say that as if we already had 4nm x86 chipsets. Or were even close to seeing them on roadmaps. We're not. They don't exist. Hence why Sony would be forced to go with a mobile chipset.
And again, taking a mobile chip, as opposed to a die shrink to play PS4 games would negate the purpose of a portable PS4 because it would require porting.
I have not seen the X2 benchmarked directly against the A11, but the point is almost stupidly moot anyways because Apple is not going to license their in-house designs to Sony. That's just not in their business model.
Also the Tegra X1 isn't the chip Sony would be after if they were building a powerful mobile console, it would be a theoretical Tegra X3. Something that is likely on Nintendos and NVIDIAs 10-year roadmap.
My point is that NVIDIA (and Apple but that is irrelevant for this discussion) are ahead on high fidelity video game specialized mobile chips (wich they would be, seeing their core business....) and no one else on the market really comes close to delivering the chips that they do. The A11 and the Snapdragon literally just released this year, so you're comparing a two year old chip with brand new ones at this point as well.
So if sony can't use NVIDIA chips and they can't use Apples chips, they are stuck with snapdragon, who according to you just released a chip this year that is 'pretty much on par' with the 2-year old x1. Case and point.