Not a Sports game. 

Perhaps EA needs to diversify their line-up some more because it's basically all sports titles and FPS. 

I can guarantee you that you guys would also complain about EA if they had chosen any other game than FIFA as first Switch game, no matter if it were Madden, Need for Speed, an FPS or one of their popular mobile games.

Plants vs Zombies GW would've been a nice and welcomed surprise, and people who like Splatoon might have tried it out. The Sims or Sim City would have hit a cord with the Switch's audience, seeing that games like Stardew Valley have made quite good numbers there. A port of Dragon Age games would have been decent too, using the same reasoning as Bethesda did with Skyrim (Zelda fans liked BotW, Skyrim/DA is a somewhat similar game, let's make it and see what happens). Dead Space, even if its developer has been axed, could do well too, considering that there aren't that many terror games on the system, plus it has some Metroid-esque vives. And of course, they have a plethora of things they could've done with Star Wars. This is all counting all of the mostly mobile offerings they could have brought to the tablet that's the Switch: Zuma's Revenge, the OG Plants vs Zombies, Peegle Blast... They would have been ridiculously easy to port, and no matter how little they would've done, they would have still made profit.

This is all taking into account that, if the FIFA game we've gotten was a fully featured game (if it had all the features the other versions had) it would have done significantly better. People don't like paying the same price for an incomplete version.

Point is, EA had tons of options for a decent trial run. And the one they picked was gimped from the beginning. So people being angry at them is understandable.

Tbh it says a lot when EA are the only ones out of publishers including Ubisoft, Namco, Koei and such who didn't garner any success on the platform.

Exactly, Mr Pugsly is trying to say Nintendo is an outlier.This gen that is starting to become an incorrect assumption. Its EA who is the outlier on the Nintendo platform. Almost every third party will have an exclusive for the switch. After Squares success on the DS you know they are bringing the traditional JRPG's to the switch. Ubisoft has already found success. Activision and EA are all thats left because Namco is in.

Only because the only notable game release during that quarter was Mario + Rabbids Kingdom Battle but if we take a look at the entire fiscal year instead it will paint a very different picture where it is Xbox that will decimate whatever profits Nintendo can bring them for years and years to come ... 

Eh. Kinda pointless. I mean, the only games they make that I buy are madden (about 2x per gen), Battlefield, and Battlefront (basically DICE stuff).

I see Battlefield and Battlefront being more of a PS4 purchase. I do think I would buy a madden on the Switch though.

There is a lot of anger in your post. You talk to me like I'm some sort of anti Nintendo guy but really I'm just skeptical of how well Switch can do with core titles that do well on other platforms. Based on trends with past Nintendo platforms, home and handheld.

It doesn't matter if I like the Switch, I'm making assumptions based on trends and so did developers who chose to support it or not. I can really love a platform and still understand why it lacks certain support.

Again, you don't understand what I mean by outlier. There are core titles that do fairly well on PC, Xbox, and PlayStation but aren't worth supporting on Switch. That's what makes it an outlier. With that said, this is also why Xbox lacks Japanese content, Xbox is an outlier with that audience. You seem to think outlier means its a platform NOBODY wants, either you're playing dumb to make an argument or misinterpreting.

You keep praising Ubisoft because of Mario and Rabbids, but when you put Mario in anything it has potential to sell really well. Unfortunately I don't think every developer has access to Mario. I mean there is no Mario in Doom for example.

So again, Ubisoft did well on Switch thanks to having access to Mario and they made a typical family friendly project for Nintendo's audience. Meanwhile, Xbox got For Honor, Wildlands, South Park, and AC: Origins. It appears to me Ubisoft is catering to these specific platforms in different ways based on trends. Interesting, huh?

.... countless Marios and Zeldas???? They make those at the very most twice per gen(or 0 in the WiiUs case). Mario? I mean since 1996 there has been 5 3D marios(M64, SMS, GAL1+2 and Odyssey) and 6 console Zeldas(OoT, MM, WW, SS, TP, BoTW). In 21 years there has been 11 mainline Marios and Zeldas combined. Get that shit out of here man. Don't try to make it look like Nintendo is going Activision or EA on their franchises. 

Again, you're misinterpreting.

Compared to other platforms the Nintendo audience is the outlier and that's why they don't get a lot of the same popular titles on other platforms.

Doom and Wolfenstein are coming to Switch because a big audience for those games is there per se. They are testing the water to see if audience is there. But much like CoD on Wii, games like that could do well at first and fade.