Or perhaps he's criticizing you based on your collectivist and authoritarian tendencies that are deep-rooted in both Naziism and ANTIFA (anarchocommunism).

I don't even know what Antifa is.

I'm willing to bet it's because I write in a German accent!

Antifa = Anti-Fa scist.

It's basically a loose group of extreme far-left individuals rather than a highly oragnized group with any kind of relevence.
They are happy to resort to violence to achieve their goals.
However Neo-Nazi's are generally far more organized and generally a larger collective... Ironically the ONLY reason Antifa exists is because of Fascism... As Facism continues to grow and become more mainstream, then so will those who oppose it.

They do share allot of similarities with the far right... Which lends credence to the horseshoe political spectrum theory... Which is the farther left or right you go, the more you end up being the same.

A.)  The current Nazi's might not be doing immense amount of crimes.  That doesn't mean they are peaceful, and that doesn't mean they have the right to be Nazi's.  They are glorifying a group of people that killed more than 6 million people due to their ethnicity.  

B.)  A lot of conservatives claim ANTIFA to be bad and violent, even though most of them aren't much more violent than a football game.  Statistically more violent, but it's comparing a football game to a protest.  Protests are more likely to get rowdy.  

C.)  I'm not saying that people who are part of ANTIFA haven't done bad things, but that it is exaggerated most of the time.  

D.)  My point is not that Nazi's are violent and ANTIFA isn't.  So I didn't raise that point that you claim I did in the bolded.  

E.)  The Nazi's today aren't disliked because they are being violent.  They are disliked because of what they believe.  Conservatives have similar feelings about communists.  

I bet that you like communism.

A) Of course they have a right to be Nazis. This isn't Orwell's 1984. You cannot police thoughts. Hating other people isn't a crime, but assaulting them is.

B) Football games can be very violent. Besides just because something is more or similarly violent something else doesn't mean the violence is justified or tolerable.

C) Exaggerated how? Check out that guy that was busting people's heads open with a bike lock (and promptly arrested and charged for it). Check out everything that is Yvonne Falarca. She has some pretty dangerous thoughts too. But I guess her dangerous thoughts are okay because she assaults people she disagrees with whether they're nazis or not, right? Many of the Antifa/BAMN members that have been unmasked and their ideas exposed have turned out to be pretty horrible people.

D) My point was I am against both Nazis and Antifa, they're both deplorable groups for different reasons.

E) There seems to a very common connection between many members of ANTIFA - many of the appear to also be very Communist. So why should we also not dislike ANTIFA for what they believe?

Actually, ANTIFA is more violent than fans at football games in terms of per capita. Go back a few pages where I already showed pi-guy the math and for some reason, he has opted not to challenge those numbers.

That's cool and all... except that is not at all the case because you have been consistently defending them in this thread and have been scapegoating Jewish people. You must think I haven't been reading a word you typed this entire time to much such a statement. You say here that you don't tolerate nazis commiting crime, yet you literally said in your last response, "eventhough I think Nazi's are wrong and those that persecute jews are wrong, I understand that it is my oppinion and I show tolerance towards the other side." 

I also love how you say you aren't the thought police, yet are stating that no media should be created about murdering these monsters in VIDEO GAMES. A FICTIONAL DEPICTION. And as for the the bolded part...

Here's the fundamental difference between me and you. You consistently deny facts and thus reason. When given or asked for facts, you try to act as if they don't matter, calling them arbitrary, question their relevance, and give strawman examples. This is not just in your replies to me, but others in this thread. This attempt to remove facts can only be defined as willfull ignorance. There is no logic in that. Now why bring up this lack of logic on your part? Unlike you, I bring up logical arguments in dealing with the topic: Murdering Nazis in VIDEOGAMES. You'll notice that, I have continually highlighted "VIDEOGAMES" every time I bring up murdering Nazis to highlight how ridiculous it is to be so upset that they are being killed in a VIDEOGAME. Never once do I suggest straying from the topic to talk about something that isn't in the realm of the subject about a VIDEOGAME. You, however, continue to do so because you can't logically counterargue the topic.

Bringing up punching and killing Nazis in real life, in relation to a VIDEOGAME, is ridiculous in and of itself, but you somehow top it off with what you say in the underlined. Justification for real life violence and persecution is something YOU brought up in the first place to irronically defend your poor, vilified Nazis. Something I immediately smashed to bits because of the lack of facts and thus, lack of logic. The fact that you continue to bring up real Nazi victimization (lmao) reveals that you can't seperate video game violence from real world violence. For all these decades, people didn't play the Wolfenstein series and start punching people Nazis. This is absolutely your own personal fear and hysteria talking. Something that you wouldn't conclude in the first place if you thought about the facts. This is why, at the core, all of what you have said and stood for in this thread is beyond sad and downright disgusting.