By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Microsoft Is Trying to Keep PUBG Off PS4 for Longer

PUBG is still in early access right?



Around the Network
Plerpy_ said:
PUBG is still in early access right?

Yes it is, not sure when the full release is planned.



DonFerrari said:
AngryLittleAlchemist said:

You said competition is not always important and can often even be a hinderence. I asked if Switch is applicable to this, being the only forseeable handheld right now. 

Also, everyone thinks their mindset is older then they are .... lol. 

Natural monopoly isn't really bad. Because it only shows the market isn't big or interesting enough for more players to go for it. But if the monopolistic holder doesn't provide a good service then the barriers of entry lower down and someone may go over there and take it. But the same marketing having too much competition could mean all companies dying together.

Yeah I agree with that. Luckily, the Switch is a great product. So it being a monopoly(if it becomes super successful) wouldn't be such a bad thing. Still, I want to know Pickle's opinion too.



VGPolyglot said:
Plerpy_ said:
PUBG is still in early access right?

Yes it is, not sure when the full release is planned.

So at this point, the exclusivity period will just be for the early access and the full release will be on multiple consoles?

Seems weird to me for Microsoft to be doing this for a game without a full release I guess. I hope that Micro's exclusivity is for when the full game launches because otherwise it makes no sense to me.



AngryLittleAlchemist said:
DonFerrari said:

Natural monopoly isn't really bad. Because it only shows the market isn't big or interesting enough for more players to go for it. But if the monopolistic holder doesn't provide a good service then the barriers of entry lower down and someone may go over there and take it. But the same marketing having too much competition could mean all companies dying together.

Yeah I agree with that. Luckily, the Switch is a great product. So it being a monopoly(if it becomes super successful) wouldn't be such a bad thing. Still, I want to know Pickle's opinion too.

It can become so successfull that Sony may decide to try again a PS portable, maybe what PSVita could have been playing the full library of PS4.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Around the Network
twintail said:
Zkuq said:

Considering this follow-up tweet, it sounds like it's more of a necessity he doesn't like but has to do anyway.

Then perhaps he should have said that in the frist place instead of trying to damage control his own tweet.

First, the tweets are from last December, so in that context, it might not have been especially controversial in the first place. Second, it seems like a fairly subjective tweet (because of "doesn't feel") in a thread not visible to his followers by default, so I don't see this as failed PR + damage control anyway. It's an accurate statement, and it's not misleading either. Of course you're free to interpret the motives otherwise.



DonFerrari said:
AngryLittleAlchemist said:

Yeah I agree with that. Luckily, the Switch is a great product. So it being a monopoly(if it becomes super successful) wouldn't be such a bad thing. Still, I want to know Pickle's opinion too.

It can become so successfull that Sony may decide to try again a PS portable, maybe what PSVita could have been playing the full library of PS4.

The best bet is just to ride the PS4 train out and make PS5 a hybrid in my opinion. Which is funny, because I actually thought for the last few months that making a straight handheld would serve them well. It really depends ... with the PSP and Vita there was too many problems from Sony.



AngryLittleAlchemist said:

You said competition is not always important and can often even be a hinderence. I asked if Switch is applicable to this, being the only forseeable handheld right now. 

People argue that competition is required for consumerism to flourish but we see that this is not the case in vast portions of our life ... (see elastic demand)

Many goods and services in life are monopolized from one extent to another but a monopoly can in fact actually self-destruct if customers can't handle the compromises set by producers or service providers ... 

Switch being the only portable console so far is not a problem since there's no extreme impediments for it but that doesn't mean consumers can't react differently to how the change in Switch systems are sold when the said manufacturer has a monopoly. For monopolies such as the Switch to be sustainable or any monopolies for that matter the manufacturer's have to be reasonable about parameters such as pricing (very few are going to buy a Switch system at $1000 so settling for $300 is in the realm of being acceptable) or support (Nintendo still has to release games on the Switch regardless of monopoly or not) 



AngryLittleAlchemist said:
DonFerrari said:

It can become so successfull that Sony may decide to try again a PS portable, maybe what PSVita could have been playing the full library of PS4.

The best bet is just to ride the PS4 train out and make PS5 a hybrid in my opinion. Which is funny, because I actually thought for the last few months that making a straight handheld would serve them well. It really depends ... with the PSP and Vita there was too many problems from Sony.

I wouldn't like a PS5 being hibrid... and when I said PSVita with full PS4 library I was giving an example, meaning that on launch of PS5 we also get a handheld and or a hibrid that can play PS5 games with some acceptable compromise (akin to what Switch have and PSVita was supposed to have)



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

celador said:
such hypocrisy, but when your first party is creatively bankrupt, you gotta do whatever it takes to remain remotely competitive

MS has fallen so far wrt first party exclusives. The OG Xbox had Ninja Gaiden, Halo 1 & 2, Blinx The Time Sweeper, Crimson Skies, etc. No ScaleBound was the tipping point for me not to get an Xbox One. Even last gen was pretty good. Too bad, better luck next gen, MS.



Currently (Re-)Playing: Starcraft 2: Legacy of the Void Multiplayer, The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past

Currently Watching: The Shield, Stein's;Gate, Narcos