By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
AngryLittleAlchemist said:
DonFerrari said:

Natural monopoly isn't really bad. Because it only shows the market isn't big or interesting enough for more players to go for it. But if the monopolistic holder doesn't provide a good service then the barriers of entry lower down and someone may go over there and take it. But the same marketing having too much competition could mean all companies dying together.

Yeah I agree with that. Luckily, the Switch is a great product. So it being a monopoly(if it becomes super successful) wouldn't be such a bad thing. Still, I want to know Pickle's opinion too.

It can become so successfull that Sony may decide to try again a PS portable, maybe what PSVita could have been playing the full library of PS4.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."