By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - Trump Announces Ban on Transgender People in US Military

 

You support this?

No. 206 29.68%
 
Yes. 311 44.81%
 
^ What the hell is wrong ... 177 25.50%
 
Total:694
mizzou_guy on 26 July 2017
TruckOSaurus said:
A good title for a book about Trump's administration would "CTRL-Z".

Seriously, I don't even know what their goals are, other than to avoid blame and undo the previous administration's accomplishments.  What are their goals???



Around the Network
VGPolyglot on 26 July 2017
Ka-pi96 said:
VGPolyglot said:

Now, I'm against the idea of the military altogether, so I don't think anyone should be in it, but this is obviously a transphobic move.

Probably is a transphobic move, but I still think it's partially justified based on the fact that they would almost certainly need special allowances made for them that other groups don't get.

Does seem a bit over the top in that I don't expect there would be many issues, if any, for purely domestic based jobs.

Which special allowances would they need?



StarOcean on 26 July 2017
Ka-pi96 said:
VGPolyglot said:

Now, I'm against the idea of the military altogether, so I don't think anyone should be in it, but this is obviously a transphobic move.

Probably is a transphobic move, but I still think it's partially justified based on the fact that they would almost certainly need special allowances made for them that other groups don't get.

Does seem a bit over the top in that I don't expect there would be many issues, if any, for purely domestic based jobs.

Not allowing them in service only saves the US $8 million a year. That's absolutely nothing especially when it cost, Melania Trump, $9 mil a month to have her stay in NYC. Don't even wanna know how much his golf trips have racked up



Tulipanzo on 26 July 2017
Ka-pi96 said:
VGPolyglot said:

Now, I'm against the idea of the military altogether, so I don't think anyone should be in it, but this is obviously a transphobic move.

Probably is a transphobic move, but I still think it's partially justified based on the fact that they would almost certainly need special allowances made for them that other groups don't get.

Does seem a bit over the top in that I don't expect there would be many issues, if any, for purely domestic based jobs.

You recognize it's a transphobic move, but you still go out of your way to justify it.

Congrats on being a shill



TruckOSaurus on 26 July 2017
mizzou_guy said:
TruckOSaurus said:
A good title for a book about Trump's administration would "CTRL-Z".

Seriously, I don't even know what their goals are, other than to avoid blame and undo the previous administration's accomplishments.  What are their goals???

To make America great again of course... whatever that means.



Signature goes here!

Around the Network
jason1637 on 26 July 2017

Well if it cost extra to take care of their medical needs this is the best move.



Tulipanzo on 26 July 2017
jason1637 said:
Well if it cost extra to take care of their medical needs this is the best move.

Funny enough they said the same thing about women joining the army.

Not that a coward masking his bigotry with "costs" would now



jason1637 on 26 July 2017
Tulipanzo said:
Trump is a cowardly piece of shit, his administration a disgrace, is party a cancer on the U.S., his supporters the dumbest motherfuckers alive
Fuck him and whoever supports this.

Well that pretty rude.



StarOcean on 26 July 2017
jason1637 said:
Tulipanzo said:
Trump is a cowardly piece of shit, his administration a disgrace, is party a cancer on the U.S., his supporters the dumbest motherfuckers alive
Fuck him and whoever supports this.

Well that pretty rude.

No, he's right



mizzou_guy on 26 July 2017
jason1637 said:
Tulipanzo said:
Trump is a cowardly piece of shit, his administration a disgrace, is party a cancer on the U.S., his supporters the dumbest motherfuckers alive
Fuck him and whoever supports this.

Well that pretty rude.

Ironically, so is discrimination.