At this point it's your word against mine. Others can just watch the video and see for themselves.

MHXX's production values are a joke, it would have been subpar a decade ago. It could be everthing it is now and look great. The only thing preventing this is Capcom's laziness. They will continue to do the bare minimum for as long as they can get away with it, and the result is inferior products like this.

Inferior products just because they haven't amazing graphics? Since when did you become such a graphic whore? And so irrational too, because you perfectly understand this is a good move, this is a great way to have a Monster Hunter game just few months after the console is released which is great for the console, if you were complaining about the next MH I would maybe understand it, but this one? Really?

Inferior because it could be so much better than it is, and it falls far short of the standards of both its time and its platform.

You are transforming something which is by all means great news into a bad thing, is like you do it almost unconciusly.

Monster Hunter 5 will be vastly different to this, but for now this is perfectly fine and a great move for switch.

There isn't any torchlight being cast on Jaggi 1:21, and two players with torches are standing on the camera side of Jaggi yet the shadow isn't being cast away from their torches as it should, it remains unaffected.

Posting native 240p screens here on a computer doesn't necessarily echo what it looks like on 3DS, as due to differences in pixel density a 400x240 image here actually looks better than the game does on the 3DS.

For example, here's a 240p image of MH4:

On my screen, this appears smaller and therefore better than on my actual 3DS. This is closer to the size and therefore quality of the actual game:

Gameplay gifs and 400x240 screens are basically bullshots in this context because their tiny size on PC screens makes the game look better than it actually does. Due to the higher pixel density of our screens, the image is much smaller, therefore the flaws that are obvious on the actual 3DS screen are hidden. As a result, making the picture 25% bigger as I have done here is more representative of its actual appearance on 3DS.

 Except it looks really good for the hardware inside the tiny handheld, the machine has limitations, 3DS has never been comparable with ps3 or similar, so I don't know what is your point here at all, but, in any case, outside the obvious limitations on resolution MH looks definitely better than the average Dreamcast games and you gotta be blind to not see that. 

That was kinda my point; 3DS is just too limited to do the series justice. Whether its Nintendo's fault, or Capcom's, or both, the end result is that it just looks really horrible by modern standards.

Some say that Capcom never wanted to leave the PS2-low definition framework, so they just kept releasing the game on the same "engine" again and again on deprecated Nintendo consoles like Wii, Wii U and 3DS.

That's an easy way to make money.