I'm asking on a game being non exclusive when it's able to be played on 2 out of the 4 systems vs a game being played on only one system out of the 4, but apparently you put so much focus on the tone of the question rather than answering it.

You tell me of negativity coming from my end, but I snesed negativity from the Star Citizen part when you sued M#9 as a prime example, yet we don't even know the end result of what will happen with SC, so using the worst case scenario didn't exactly ooze positivty either. 

Have you been watching the project over time in general, to know how it's coming along and what exactly is being put into it?.

Sorry, I didn't mean negativity as in a bad vibe. I meant triple negative as in confusing grammar. It's a simple comparison between games that are playable on the PS4, but not playable on the PC, VS games that are playable on PC, but not PS4.

No, I haven't been paying attention at all to Star Citizen.

Edit: Link explaining what a double negative, and triple negative is. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_negative

This has all been on a steady trajectory ever since the PS3 Slim launched tbh. It seems so far away but Sony was in a really shitty place prior to the 2009 combo of PS3 Slim + Uncharted 2. From there on the Sony that started the race in 2006 had evolved into the Sony that's dominating today. A huge focus and emphasis on First party and enabling their studios to pursue creative risks combined with the other two fucking it up. Sony just reasserted their rightful place on the throne.

PS4 Master Race indeed.

I don't understand this shit either. I'm flabbergasted 

The Playstation never 'lost its glory', last gen was a tight competition, but selling 85M is still really impressive

As for Nintendo, they just made a lot of mistakes and didn't learn from them so the Wii U did really poorly

Wii U/3DS will not be anywhere near PS4/Vita by the end of the gen lol. PS4 is going to sell at least 85 million (I would guess it ends around 95) and obviously  the Wii U is never going to catch the Vita

LOL @ Wasteland 2 an indie. Also, it's not exclusive. It's on Xbone and PS4. Where it retails for $40. Ignoring the amount of content and work that goes into a game because it is scalable and can be played on older hardware and labeling it an indie as such is just nonsense. And PC gaming is chock full of games like that which unlike Wasteland 2, will never come to consoles.

If your criteria for exclusive is "can be played on one platform and not the other" then why'd you even list PC and leave Xbox out?

2014: 5 exclusives 80+, I guess all but Kalimba would "count" for you.
2015: 5 exclusives 80+, all "AAA", not counting Tomb Raider since it's no longer exclusive.
2016: 5 exclusives 80+, all "AAA" but FRU, which was a fuck awesome Kinect title.
2017: 1 so far, would be 2 but Halo Wars 2 is at 79.

So it's strange to see you say "Microsoft has given up on exclusives" as if they have zero but going by your own definition, the Xbox would outclass the PC in exclusives that matter. Equally weird is you dismiss Microsoft as having given up on exclusives and yet all 11 of those exclusives that by your definition count are games they developed or published where as with the PS4 list 11 of those 19 titles are either made or developed by Sony, the rest are de facto standard Japanese exclusives Sony had nothing to do with or weird exclusives that shouldn't be on the list like uh, Arkham Knight. So 11 exclusives that matter by your definition from both Microsoft and Sony and yet Microsoft has given up on exclusives and Sony is doing a phenomenal job with them. Makes sense.

edit, my math was off, it's actually 14 exclusives that count by your definition from "given up on exclusives" Microsoft versus 11 from Sony. lol. I'm just gonna bow out of this thread.

They focused on games..... they started taking the market back in 2012, when PS3 was outselling both Wii and 360 consistently, and into 2013.... Sony went from being about on par with Microsoft with first party ip to beating Nintendo in quantity and quality.....

This gen Sony have dropped bomb after bomb of monster exclusive games, and they keep adding to their list of great ip, UNCHARTED is arguably as big as HALO

the main reason was their promise of games not the few launch games it had. the line up they annouced was amazing, yet most of it come out ages after launch. As i said great marketing strategy. No one cared that they would come later they knew they were coming out on the PS4.

They played it safe, they read the market and responded with a machine that does its job and made sure that games keep rolling in and kept the whole thing priced reasonably. Nothing special, their winning back the market has very little to do with the PS4 being some incredible, amazing machine and a lot to do with MS screwing themselves out of a proper chance before they even got to the gate and Nintendo making their biggest mistakes so far, by a mile.
The PS4 took no risks and played on the complacency of the industry and market, and it worked really well for them, but doesn't make for an earth-shattering gaming experience overall.

It's basically a PS3 with better hardware and a worse main controller, and I'm just fine with that, not over the moon.