How the heck did Sony manage to retake the console market again?

[Cerebralbore]

Chazore said:

Cerebralbore said:

Could you reword your first question so it's not a triple negative? I honestly have no idea what you are trying to say with it. For all I know Star Citizen could wind up being epic, and with high enough production values to put it squarely in AAA territory.

I'm asking on a game being non exclusive when it's able to be played on 2 out of the 4 systems vs a game being played on only one system out of the 4, but apparently you put so much focus on the tone of the question rather than answering it.

You tell me of negativity coming from my end, but I snesed negativity from the Star Citizen part when you sued M#9 as a prime example, yet we don't even know the end result of what will happen with SC, so using the worst case scenario didn't exactly ooze positivty either. 

Have you been watching the project over time in general, to know how it's coming along and what exactly is being put into it?.

Sorry, I didn't mean negativity as in a bad vibe. I meant triple negative as in confusing grammar. It's a simple comparison between games that are playable on the PS4, but not playable on the PC, VS games that are playable on PC, but not PS4.

No, I haven't been paying attention at all to Star Citizen.

Edit: Link explaining what a double negative, and triple negative is. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_negative